Quentin Lohmeyer

600 total citations
52 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Quentin Lohmeyer is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Quentin Lohmeyer has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 13 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 10 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Quentin Lohmeyer's work include Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (13 papers), Design Education and Practice (12 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (6 papers). Quentin Lohmeyer is often cited by papers focused on Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (13 papers), Design Education and Practice (12 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (6 papers). Quentin Lohmeyer collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Quentin Lohmeyer's co-authors include Mirko Meboldt, Albert Albers, Julian Wolf, Stephan Hess, Sven Matthiesen, Francesco Maisano, Daniel A. Hofmaenner, Reto A. Schuepbach, Philipp K. Buehler and Christian Holz and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Quentin Lohmeyer

48 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Quentin Lohmeyer Switzerland 11 114 79 68 61 53 52 370
Keshav Chintamani United States 7 65 0.6× 53 0.7× 115 1.7× 49 0.8× 9 0.2× 14 443
Frédéric Noël France 9 81 0.7× 50 0.6× 51 0.8× 12 0.2× 47 0.9× 44 314
Avinash Gupta United States 9 74 0.6× 56 0.7× 100 1.5× 78 1.3× 4 0.1× 35 318
Randall J. Mumaw United States 10 61 0.5× 20 0.3× 61 0.9× 93 1.5× 11 0.2× 41 707
Julia Fink Switzerland 9 62 0.5× 42 0.5× 44 0.6× 36 0.6× 5 0.1× 21 413
Jennifer M. Riley United States 13 62 0.5× 48 0.6× 45 0.7× 94 1.5× 7 0.1× 32 543
Wesley E. Woodson Norway 6 65 0.6× 77 1.0× 26 0.4× 23 0.4× 26 0.5× 20 605
Katharina Mura Germany 7 97 0.9× 30 0.4× 90 1.3× 14 0.2× 8 0.2× 9 497
Yeling Jiang United States 6 165 1.4× 23 0.3× 71 1.0× 19 0.3× 5 0.1× 8 303
Anna‐Lisa Osvalder Sweden 15 62 0.5× 24 0.3× 20 0.3× 106 1.7× 35 0.7× 83 616

Countries citing papers authored by Quentin Lohmeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Quentin Lohmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quentin Lohmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quentin Lohmeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Quentin Lohmeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Quentin Lohmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Quentin Lohmeyer. The network helps show where Quentin Lohmeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Quentin Lohmeyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Quentin Lohmeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Quentin Lohmeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Quentin Lohmeyer. Quentin Lohmeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tanadini‐Lang, Stephanie, Quentin Lohmeyer, Mirko Meboldt, et al.. (2024). Automatized self-supervised learning for skin lesion screening. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 12697–12697. 2 indexed citations
2.
Kolbe, Michaela, et al.. (2023). Measuring teamwork for training in healthcare using eye tracking and pose estimation. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1169940–1169940. 7 indexed citations
3.
Lohmeyer, Quentin, et al.. (2023). Gaze is more than just a point: Rethinking visual attention analysis using peripheral vision-based gaze mapping. Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich). 1–7.
4.
Lohmeyer, Quentin, et al.. (2023). What we see is what we do: a practical Peripheral Vision-Based HMM framework for gaze-enhanced recognition of actions in a medical procedural task. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 33(4). 939–965. 7 indexed citations
5.
Wolf, Julian, et al.. (2023). How different augmented reality visualizations for drilling affect trajectory deviation, visual attention, and user experience. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 18(8). 1363–1371. 12 indexed citations
6.
Kolbe, Michaela, et al.. (2023). Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). 12–12. 8 indexed citations
7.
Meboldt, Mirko, et al.. (2021). An algorithmic approach to determine expertise development using object-related gaze pattern sequences. Behavior Research Methods. 54(1). 493–507. 6 indexed citations
8.
Wolf, Julian, et al.. (2021). Comparing the effectiveness of augmented reality-based and conventional instructions during single ECMO cannulation training. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 16(7). 1171–1180. 25 indexed citations
9.
Mueller, Marcus, Marianne Schmid Daners, Evgenij Potapov, et al.. (2021). Eye Tracking Supported Human Factors Testing Improving Patient Training. Journal of Medical Systems. 45(5). 55–55. 4 indexed citations
11.
Hofmaenner, Daniel A., et al.. (2020). Use of eye tracking in analyzing distribution of visual attention among critical care nurses in daily professional life: an observational study. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 35(6). 1511–1518. 18 indexed citations
12.
Zimmermann, Jan Michael, et al.. (2019). Visual Behaviour Strategies of Operators during Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions. Journal of Medical Systems. 44(1). 12–12. 10 indexed citations
13.
Lohmeyer, Quentin, et al.. (2019). A comparison of how novice and experienced design engineers benefit from design guidelines. Design Studies. 63. 204–223. 15 indexed citations
14.
Wolf, Julian, et al.. (2018). Automating areas of interest analysis in mobile eye tracking experiments based on machine learning. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 11(6). 38 indexed citations
15.
Singer, Daniel, et al.. (2017). Automated interpretation of eye–hand coordination in mobile eye tracking recordings. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz. 31(4). 331–337. 11 indexed citations
16.
Lohmeyer, Quentin, Sven Matthiesen, & Mirko Meboldt. (2014). TASK-DEPENDENT VISUAL BEHAVIOUR OF ENGINEERING DESIGNERS - AN EYE TRACKING EXPERIMENT. 549–558. 2 indexed citations
17.
Meboldt, Mirko, et al.. (2014). PROTOTYPING WITH LASER CUTTERS IN LARGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CLASSES. 1411–1420. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lohmeyer, Quentin, et al.. (2014). Raising Designers' Awareness of User Experience by Mobile Eye Tracking Records. 99–104. 8 indexed citations
19.
Meboldt, Mirko, et al.. (2013). Impart âdesign for productionâ knowledge by application of functional prototyping. 617–622. 1 indexed citations
20.
Albers, Albert, et al.. (2011). TRIZ-Box in Design Education - A Study on Supporting Creativity. 143–148. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026