Dania Thomas
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender, Security, and Conflict
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Finance top 10%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Papers in
-
- Income, Poverty, and Inequality 2
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 2
- Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Catherine Hoskyns (2 shared papers)Marcus Miller (2 shared papers)Shirin Rai (1 shared paper)Bettina Lange (1 shared paper)Patrick W. Jordan (1 shared paper)Austin Sarat (1 shared paper)Sayantan Ghosal (1 shared paper)Sarah Keenan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Feminist Legal Studies (3 papers)World Economy (1 paper)International Feminist Journal of Politics (1 paper)Indian Economic Review (1 paper)Osgoode Hall law journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsArgentina
In The Last Decade
Dania Thomas
12 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Gender Studies 81
- Finance 52
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- Political Science and International Relations 57
- Public Administration 7
Countries citing papers authored by Dania Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Dania Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dania Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dania Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dania Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dania Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dania Thomas. The network helps show where Dania Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Dania Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 188 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 3 | Depletion and social reproduction | 2011 | 12 |
| 4 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 8 | Sovereign debt restructuring: the Judge, the vultures and the future of creditor rights* | 2006 | 2 |
| 9 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 0 |
About Dania Thomas
Dania Thomas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Strategy and Management, Finance and Law, having authored 14 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Financial Crisis and Policies (3 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2 papers) and Corporate Insolvency and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (81 citations), Finance (52 citations), Sociology and Political Science (109 citations), Political Science and International Relations (57 citations) and Public Administration (7 citations). Dania Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Hoskyns, Marcus Miller, Shirin Rai, Bettina Lange, Patrick W. Jordan, Austin Sarat, Sayantan Ghosal, Sarah Keenan, Sheelagh McGuinness and Ambreena Manji. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Legal Studies, World Economy, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Indian Economic Review and Osgoode Hall law journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.