Dania Jose
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 11
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 3
- Co-authors
- Ganesan Venkatasubramanian (18 shared papers)Sunil V. Kalmady (15 shared papers)Venkataram Shivakumar (13 shared papers)Bangalore N. Gangadhar (6 shared papers)Vasanthapuram Ravi (6 shared papers)Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy (12 shared papers)Sri Mahavir Agarwal (8 shared papers)Matcheri S. Keshavan (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (5 papers)Asian Journal of Psychiatry (3 papers)eLife (2 papers)Thrombosis Research (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Dania Jose
22 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Biological Psychiatry 57
- Behavioral Neuroscience 28
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Neurology 28
- Cognitive Neuroscience 60
Countries citing papers authored by Dania Jose
This map shows the geographic impact of Dania Jose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dania Jose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dania Jose more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dania Jose
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dania Jose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dania Jose. The network helps show where Dania Jose may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dania Jose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 3 | Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging | 2015 | 25 |
| 4 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Dania Jose
Dania Jose is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Biology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (11 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper) and Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (57 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (28 citations), Clinical Psychology (79 citations), Neurology (28 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (60 citations). Dania Jose has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, Sunil V. Kalmady, Venkataram Shivakumar, Bangalore N. Gangadhar, Vasanthapuram Ravi, Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy, Sri Mahavir Agarwal, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Aditi Subramaniam and Y.C. Janardhan Reddy. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, Asian Journal of Psychiatry, eLife, Thrombosis Research and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.