Dandan Kong

1.1k citations
61 papers · 935 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Dandan Kong

58 papers receiving 923 citations

Peers

Dandan Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Electrochemistry 119
  • Analytical Chemistry 151
  • Catalysis 89
  • Pollution 135
  • Bioengineering 60
Replace Yuntao Gao with:
Yuntao Gao China
Sazlinda Kamaruzaman Malaysia
Mehmet Harbi Çalımlı Türkiye
Herbert Musarurwa South Africa
Ahmad Aqel Saudi Arabia
You Liang China
Píer Parpot Portugal
Fardin Sadeghfar Iran
Laura Donato Italy
Marieta L.C. Passos Portugal
Dandan Kong relative to Yuntao Gao China Yuntao Gao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Yuntao Gao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dandan Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dandan Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dandan Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dandan Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dandan Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dandan Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dandan Kong. The network helps show where Dandan Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dandan Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dandan Kong Line = papers co-authored together Dandan Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017115
2 201795
3 201757
4 201953
5 201744
6 201543
7 201536
8 201734
9 201829
10 201825
11 201822
12 201322
13 202020
14 201618
15 202216
16 201816
17 202315
18 202415
19 201815
20 201514

About Dandan Kong

Dandan Kong is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Electrochemistry, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 61 papers that have together received 935 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (14 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (8 papers), Heavy Metals in Plants (7 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (7 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (5 papers), Concrete and Cement Materials Research (4 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (3 papers) and Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (119 citations), Analytical Chemistry (151 citations), Catalysis (89 citations), Pollution (135 citations) and Bioengineering (60 citations). Dandan Kong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Gang Tang, Yongsong Cao, Hongqiang Dong, Chen Fan, You Liang, Jiale Yang, Guanglong Ding, Mingcheng Guo, Wenbing Zhang and Jiaoyang Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Microchemical Journal, Construction and Building Materials, The Science of The Total Environment, Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces and Electrochimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact