Dana M. Omer

53 total papers · 1.6k total citations
15 papers, 97 citations indexed

About

Dana M. Omer is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Dana M. Omer has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 97 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Oncology, 10 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Dana M. Omer's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (9 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (7 papers). Dana M. Omer is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (9 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (7 papers). Dana M. Omer collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Israel. Dana M. Omer's co-authors include Marc J. Gollub, Julio García‐Aguilar, J. Joshua Smith, Floris S. Verheij, Hannah M. Thompson, Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Li‐Xuan Qin, Iva Petkovska, Sabrina T. Lin and Jonathan B. Yuval and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Dana M. Omer

13 papers receiving 97 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Dana M. Omer 82 51 29 28 6 15 97
Elisa Bertocchi 49 0.6× 81 1.6× 26 0.9× 20 0.7× 2 0.3× 20 125
Sergio Gribaudo 40 0.5× 33 0.6× 12 0.4× 22 0.8× 2 0.3× 11 73
Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo 50 0.6× 36 0.7× 40 1.4× 20 0.7× 3 0.5× 16 83
Rachel Baldwin‐Cleland 51 0.6× 44 0.9× 17 0.6× 11 0.4× 11 1.8× 11 96
Brendan Bebington 44 0.5× 58 1.1× 16 0.6× 21 0.8× 12 2.0× 18 104
A. Bardet 46 0.6× 14 0.3× 67 2.3× 18 0.6× 6 1.0× 19 115
Maxime J.M. van der Valk 190 2.3× 166 3.3× 42 1.4× 13 0.5× 7 1.2× 10 236
G. Salvi 39 0.5× 31 0.6× 51 1.8× 17 0.6× 10 1.7× 20 97
Stefanie Veit 49 0.6× 27 0.5× 123 4.2× 30 1.1× 5 0.8× 15 163
Sabrina T. Lin 66 0.8× 32 0.6× 32 1.1× 8 0.3× 9 1.5× 14 76

Countries citing papers authored by Dana M. Omer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana M. Omer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana M. Omer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana M. Omer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana M. Omer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana M. Omer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana M. Omer. The network helps show where Dana M. Omer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana M. Omer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana M. Omer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana M. Omer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana M. Omer. Dana M. Omer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026