Hannah Williams

65 total papers · 702 total citations
26 papers, 218 citations indexed

About

Hannah Williams is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Williams has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 218 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Oncology, 11 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Hannah Williams's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers). Hannah Williams is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers). Hannah Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Hannah Williams's co-authors include Kathreena M. Kurian, Harry R. Haynes, Claire Faulkner, Ruth‐Mary deSouza, Christopher Wragg, Paul White, Kirsten Hopkins, Malama Chisanga, Jean‐François Masson and Sylvie Trottier and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, ACS Nano and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Williams

21 papers receiving 216 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Hannah Williams 65 43 43 40 38 26 218
Rupa Juthani 32 0.5× 41 1.0× 119 2.8× 59 1.5× 35 0.9× 21 298
Xiao Li 70 1.1× 57 1.3× 13 0.3× 109 2.7× 52 1.4× 28 308
Wei Meng 22 0.3× 22 0.5× 41 1.0× 105 2.6× 47 1.2× 21 248
Hunter A. Miller 39 0.6× 13 0.3× 13 0.3× 99 2.5× 41 1.1× 32 306
Marija Mazor 18 0.3× 90 2.1× 20 0.5× 47 1.2× 7 0.2× 22 306
Dimitrios Giakoumettis 25 0.4× 33 0.8× 68 1.6× 81 2.0× 29 0.8× 30 291
Makoto Ohtake 30 0.5× 31 0.7× 62 1.4× 47 1.2× 49 1.3× 29 302
Ashley A. Weiner 82 1.3× 32 0.7× 11 0.3× 93 2.3× 64 1.7× 21 318
Yinghong Yang 36 0.6× 38 0.9× 16 0.4× 102 2.5× 83 2.2× 24 237
Shilpa Patil 48 0.7× 57 1.3× 23 0.5× 91 2.3× 24 0.6× 17 300

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Williams. The network helps show where Hannah Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Williams. Hannah Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026