Dan Titcomb

685 total citations
11 papers, 260 citations indexed

About

Dan Titcomb is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Titcomb has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 260 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Dan Titcomb's work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (7 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers). Dan Titcomb is often cited by papers focused on Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (7 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers). Dan Titcomb collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Dan Titcomb's co-authors include Jane Blazeby, C P Barham, Richard Krysztopik, Christopher G. Streets, Chris Metcalfe, Natalie Blencowe, Andrew Hollowood, Jenny Donovan, Stephen Falk and Andrew D. Hollowood and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, British journal of surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Dan Titcomb

11 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dan Titcomb United Kingdom 8 207 182 30 18 17 11 260
Gustav Linder Sweden 8 145 0.7× 101 0.6× 14 0.5× 9 0.5× 36 2.1× 18 193
Philip McElnay United Kingdom 11 132 0.6× 210 1.2× 36 1.2× 36 2.0× 49 2.9× 21 316
B.H. Elsman Netherlands 7 133 0.6× 133 0.7× 21 0.7× 36 2.0× 33 1.9× 12 214
Jon Moss United Kingdom 9 63 0.3× 105 0.6× 8 0.3× 12 0.7× 14 0.8× 16 246
Marshall Strother United States 10 101 0.5× 93 0.5× 50 1.7× 20 1.1× 38 2.2× 29 227
Jacob C. Hodges United States 7 129 0.6× 93 0.5× 15 0.5× 40 2.2× 126 7.4× 25 260
David Hoyt United States 8 257 1.2× 158 0.9× 6 0.2× 16 0.9× 8 0.5× 14 299
Olufunso Adedeji United Kingdom 7 90 0.4× 48 0.3× 20 0.7× 9 0.5× 61 3.6× 21 194
Lesley C. Dinwiddie United States 8 116 0.6× 222 1.2× 18 0.6× 10 0.6× 5 0.3× 20 318
Richard Cade Australia 11 236 1.1× 122 0.7× 11 0.4× 15 0.8× 27 1.6× 30 278

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Titcomb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Titcomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Titcomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Titcomb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Titcomb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Titcomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Titcomb. The network helps show where Dan Titcomb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Titcomb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Titcomb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Titcomb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Titcomb. Dan Titcomb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
2.
Blazeby, Jane, Dan Titcomb, Grant Sanders, et al.. (2015). Methods for evaluating innovative surgery: a nested ideal phase 2 study within an external randomised pilot (the ROMIO trial). Trials. 16(S2). 2 indexed citations
3.
Blazeby, Jane, Sean Strong, Jenny Donovan, et al.. (2014). Feasibility RCT of definitive chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal squamous cell cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 111(2). 234–240. 27 indexed citations
5.
Boddy, Alex, Jane Blazeby, Richard Krysztopik, et al.. (2014). A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 29(2). 431–437. 52 indexed citations
6.
Harrison, Michael J., et al.. (2013). Do laparoscopically-assisted and minimally invasive oesophagectomies improve outcomes when compared to the traditional open method?. International Journal of Surgery. 11(8). 718–718. 1 indexed citations
7.
Parameswaran, Rajeev, Dan Titcomb, Natalie Blencowe, et al.. (2013). Assessment and Comparison of Recovery after Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: An Exploratory Study in Two Centers. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 20(6). 1970–1977. 41 indexed citations
8.
Strong, Sean, et al.. (2012). Aorto-conduit fistula developing four years after esophagectomy. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2012(2). 8–8. 3 indexed citations
9.
Blazeby, Jane, et al.. (2011). Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. British journal of surgery. 98(4). 544–551. 33 indexed citations
10.
Titcomb, Dan, et al.. (2007). Evaluation of a radiographer‐provided barium enema service. Colorectal Disease. 10(4). 394–396. 7 indexed citations
11.
Blom, Ashley, et al.. (2003). Bacterial contamination of surgical gloves by water droplets spilt after scrubbing. Journal of Hospital Infection. 53(2). 136–139. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026