Dan Henry

18 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Dan Henry
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Otorhinolaryngology 66
  • Molecular Medicine 38
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 14
  • Urology 44
  • Epidemiology 217
Replace Elaine L. Steere with:
Elaine L. Steere United States
Philip I. Burgess United Kingdom
Robert Palmér United States
George Karachalios Greece
Christine M. Wollschlager United States
Gamze Demırel Türkiye
Stuart Carr Canada
Hyo Jung Park South Korea
Irini Mavrou Greece
Chris M. Parker Canada
Dan Henry relative to Elaine L. Steere United States Elaine L. Steere's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Elaine L. Steere · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Henry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Henry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Henry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Henry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Henry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Henry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Henry. The network helps show where Dan Henry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Henry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Henry Line = papers co-authored together Dan Henry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199775
2 200064
3 199852
4 200249
5 200334
6 199925
7 200424
8 199924
9 201223
10 199923
11 199921
12
Topics in nonlinear analysis
198221
13 199915
14 200414
15 199910
16 19999
17 19992
18 20121

About Dan Henry

Dan Henry is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (9 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (4 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (4 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (3 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (66 citations), Molecular Medicine (38 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (14 citations), Urology (44 citations) and Epidemiology (217 citations). Dan Henry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include George H. Talbot, Ernie Riffer, YannTong Chiang, Stephen O’Quinn, Alice S. Batenhorst, Roger Cady, Carolyn Watson, C. Andrew DeAbate, George Bensch and William N. Sokol. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Therapeutics, The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Current Medical Research and Opinion, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact