Dai Maruyama
Impact in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Genetics top 5%
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Papers in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 109
- Genetics 44
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 42
- Co-authors
- Kensei TobinaiYukio KobayashiAkiko Miyagi MaeshimaWataru MunakataShinichi MakitaSuguru FukuharaHirokazu TaniguchiTakashi Watanabe
- Journals
- International Journal of Hematology (20 papers)Blood (18 papers)Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology (17 papers)Cancer Science (17 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dai Maruyama
146 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.0k
- Genetics 329
- Oncology 816
- Neurology 280
- Dermatology 163
Countries citing papers authored by Dai Maruyama
This map shows the geographic impact of Dai Maruyama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dai Maruyama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dai Maruyama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dai Maruyama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dai Maruyama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dai Maruyama. The network helps show where Dai Maruyama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dai Maruyama, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 24 |
About Dai Maruyama
Dai Maruyama is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology, Hematology and Neurology, having authored 164 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (109 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (44 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (42 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (23 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (23 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (19 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (12 papers) and Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.0k citations), Genetics (329 citations), Oncology (816 citations), Neurology (280 citations) and Dermatology (163 citations). Dai Maruyama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kensei Tobinai, Yukio Kobayashi, Akiko Miyagi Maeshima, Wataru Munakata, Shinichi Makita, Suguru Fukuhara, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Takashi Watanabe, Yoshihiro Matsuno and Junko Nomoto. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hematology, Blood, Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Science and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.