Dag Teien
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- David J. SahnTakahiro ShiotaKjell KarpIzumi YamadaMichael JonesShuping GePer BjerlePeter Eriksson
- Topics
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (26 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (21 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Dag Teien
44 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 569
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 209
- Epidemiology 194
- Surgery 136
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 131
Countries citing papers authored by Dag Teien
This map shows the geographic impact of Dag Teien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dag Teien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dag Teien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dag Teien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dag Teien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dag Teien. The network helps show where Dag Teien may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dag Teien
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dag Teien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dag Teien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dag Teien. Dag Teien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Left ventricular stroke work in mitral regurgitation: an animal experimental study. | 3 |
| 6 | Invasive evaluation of mitral regurgitation: the importance of hemodynamic measurements during exercise. | 3 |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Dag Teien
Dag Teien is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (26 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (21 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (569 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (209 citations) and Epidemiology (194 citations). Dag Teien has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David J. Sahn, Takahiro Shiota, Kjell Karp, Izumi Yamada, Michael Jones, Shuping Ge, Per Bjerle, Peter Eriksson, Peter Eriksson and Brian Sinclair. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.