D. W. Decker

577 total citations
12 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

D. W. Decker is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Mathematical Physics and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, D. W. Decker has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Numerical Analysis, 3 papers in Mathematical Physics and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in D. W. Decker's work include Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (8 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (4 papers) and Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (3 papers). D. W. Decker is often cited by papers focused on Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (8 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (4 papers) and Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (3 papers). D. W. Decker collaborates with scholars based in United States. D. W. Decker's co-authors include C. T. Kelley, Herbert B. Keller and Allan D. Jepson and has published in prestigious journals such as SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

In The Last Decade

D. W. Decker

11 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. W. Decker United States 11 264 223 85 76 46 12 408
R. Kannan United States 15 301 1.1× 179 0.8× 52 0.6× 47 0.6× 16 0.3× 58 540
Daniel F. Shea United States 14 139 0.5× 138 0.6× 59 0.7× 81 1.1× 32 0.7× 29 571
Claus Schneider Germany 9 185 0.7× 110 0.5× 127 1.5× 101 1.3× 87 1.9× 15 388
E. Russo Italy 13 302 1.1× 84 0.4× 26 0.3× 219 2.9× 32 0.7× 43 495
Steven D. Taliaferro United States 12 163 0.6× 222 1.0× 28 0.3× 32 0.4× 21 0.5× 37 507
S. H. Lui Canada 14 126 0.5× 170 0.8× 234 2.8× 22 0.3× 68 1.5× 38 428
Beong In Yun South Korea 11 175 0.7× 88 0.4× 56 0.7× 103 1.4× 64 1.4× 45 359
Terry L. Herdman United States 11 241 0.9× 104 0.5× 37 0.4× 123 1.6× 28 0.6× 37 444
J. Barros-Neto United States 7 77 0.3× 175 0.8× 81 1.0× 18 0.2× 59 1.3× 23 485
D. F. Paget Australia 10 172 0.7× 57 0.3× 36 0.4× 87 1.1× 92 2.0× 13 409

Countries citing papers authored by D. W. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. W. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. W. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. W. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. W. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. W. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. W. Decker. The network helps show where D. W. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. W. Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. W. Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. W. Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. W. Decker. D. W. Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Decker, D. W.. (2013). Topics in bifurcation theory. CaltechTHESIS (California Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
2.
Jepson, Allan D. & D. W. Decker. (1986). Convergence Cones Near Bifurcation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 23(5). 959–975. 11 indexed citations
3.
Decker, D. W. & C. T. Kelley. (1985). Broyden’s Method for a Class of Problems Having Singular Jacobian at the Root. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 22(3). 566–574. 20 indexed citations
4.
Decker, D. W. & C. T. Kelley. (1985). Expanded Convergence Domains for Newton’s Method at Nearly Singular Roots. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing. 6(4). 951–966. 12 indexed citations
5.
Decker, D. W., Herbert B. Keller, & C. T. Kelley. (1983). Convergence Rates for Newton’s Method at Singular Points. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 20(2). 296–314. 70 indexed citations
6.
Decker, D. W. & C. T. Kelley. (1983). Sublinear convergence of the Chord method at singular points. Numerische Mathematik. 42(2). 147–154. 13 indexed citations
7.
Decker, D. W. & C. T. Kelley. (1982). Convergence Acceleration for Newton’s Method at Singular Points. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 19(1). 219–229. 37 indexed citations
8.
Decker, D. W. & Herbert B. Keller. (1981). Path following near bifurcation. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 34(2). 149–175. 67 indexed citations
9.
Decker, D. W. & Herbert B. Keller. (1980). Multiple limit point bifurcation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 75(2). 417–430. 41 indexed citations
10.
Decker, D. W. & C. T. Kelley. (1980). Newton’s Method at Singular Points. II. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 17(3). 465–471. 42 indexed citations
11.
Decker, D. W. & Herbert B. Keller. (1980). Solution branching - A constructive technique. 53. 12 indexed citations
12.
Decker, D. W. & C. T. Kelley. (1980). Newton’s Method at Singular Points. I. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 17(1). 66–70. 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026