D. Scargill

880 citations
26 papers · 725 indexed · h-index 13

D. Scargill

24 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

D. Scargill
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Inorganic Chemistry 418
  • Filtration and Separation 60
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 222
  • Mechanical Engineering 248
  • Analytical Chemistry 62
Replace T.V. Healy with:
T.V. Healy United Kingdom
S. K. Patil India
E.J. Wheelwright United States
Wallace W. Schulz United States
Lennart Kullberg United States
S.H. Eberle Germany
Sture Fronæus Sweden
V. Pekárek Czechia
J. C. White United States
Κ. L. Nash United States
D. Scargill relative to T.V. Healy United Kingdom T.V. Healy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
T.V. Healy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Scargill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Scargill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Scargill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Scargill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Scargill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Scargill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Scargill. The network helps show where D. Scargill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside D. Scargill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Scargill Line = papers co-authored together D. Scargill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19784
2 19753
3 19741
4 19718
5 197054
6 196918
7 19684
8 19669
9 19618
10 196110
11 19612
12 196131
13 196015
14 195919
15
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CERTAIN COMPLEXES OF RUTHENIUM, NIOBIUM, ZIRCONIUM AND URANIUM IN PLANT PROCESSES
19592
16 195962
17 195969
18 195796
19 195777
20 19569

About D. Scargill

D. Scargill is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Filtration and Separation, Process Chemistry and Technology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive element chemistry and processing (12 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (8 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (5 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (4 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (2 papers), Industrial Gas Emission Control (2 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (418 citations), Filtration and Separation (60 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (222 citations), Mechanical Engineering (248 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (62 citations). D. Scargill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Hardy, H.A.C. McKay, E. Hesford, J. M. Fletcher, J.L. Woodhead, J. M. Fletcher, K. Alcock, C.J. Hardy, T.V. Healy and D.F.C. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Analytica Chimica Acta, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026