D. Sampson

15 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

D. Sampson
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Equine 160
  • Rehabilitation 68
  • Cell Biology 132
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 61
Replace G. Tufvesson with:
G. Tufvesson Sweden
David G. Guy United States
Roy S. Dombro United States
Hyonson Hwang United States
Maria Psatha United Kingdom
Shuji Matsumoto Japan
Magno A. Lopes Brazil
Diane Kegler Netherlands
E. M. Guntsche United States
Johan Hellmér Sweden
D. Sampson relative to G. Tufvesson Sweden G. Tufvesson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
G. Tufvesson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. Sampson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Sampson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Sampson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Sampson. The network helps show where D. Sampson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside D. Sampson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. Sampson Line = papers co-authored together D. Sampson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 197557
2 198054
3 198254
4 198347
5 197446
6 196743
7 198026
8
Changes in blood gas, acid-base and metabolic parameters in horses during three-day event competition.
198024
9 199217
10 197114
11 197714
12 198213
13 19908
14
Clonazepam in the treatment of epilepsy.
19737
15 19862
16 19740

About D. Sampson

D. Sampson is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Equine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Rehabilitation and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (5 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (5 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (2 papers) and Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (160 citations), Rehabilitation (68 citations), Cell Biology (132 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (50 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (61 citations). D. Sampson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include R. J. ROSE, W.J. Hensley, Jan E. Ilkiw, G. T. L. Archer, C. Y. Huang, J. G. McLeod, David R. W. Hodgson, John J. Grygiel, R. M. Fox and Martin H.N. Tattersall. Their work appears in journals such as Clinica Chimica Acta, Research in Veterinary Science, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, Equine Veterinary Journal and Biomedical Chromatography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact