D. Rühl
Impact in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
-
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 4
- Genetics 2
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Fritz Poustka (4 shared papers)Gabriele Schmötzer (2 shared papers)Kimberly B. Werner (1 shared paper)Sabine M. Klauck (1 shared paper)Annemarie Poustka (1 shared paper)Ewald Münstermann (1 shared paper)Sven Bölte (1 shared paper)Dieter Niederacher (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Human Genetics (1 paper)Psychopathology (1 paper)Der Nervenarzt (1 paper)Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (1 paper)PubMed (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
D. Rühl
5 papers receiving 91 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Cognitive Neuroscience 89
- Genetics 62
- Clinical Psychology 25
- Psychiatry and Mental health 16
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 13
Countries citing papers authored by D. Rühl
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Rühl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Rühl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Rühl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Rühl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Rühl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Rühl. The network helps show where D. Rühl may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside D. Rühl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 36 | |
| 3 | [The intelligence structure of autistic persons]. | 1995 | 5 |
| 4 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 5 | [The predictive value of initial findings for the intermediate course of rehabilitation of adolescent schizophrenic patients]. | 1988 | 2 |
| 6 | 2016 | 0 |
About D. Rühl
D. Rühl is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 98 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Williams Syndrome Research (1 paper), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations), Genetics (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (25 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (16 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (13 citations). D. Rühl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fritz Poustka, Gabriele Schmötzer, Kimberly B. Werner, Sabine M. Klauck, Annemarie Poustka, Ewald Münstermann, Sven Bölte, Dieter Niederacher, Helmut Remschmidt and Gary L. Albrecht. Their work appears in journals such as Human Genetics, Psychopathology, Der Nervenarzt, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.