Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Jarosite and Hematite at Meridiani Planum from Opportunity's Mossbauer Spectrometer
2004592 citationsG. Klingelhöfer, R. V. Morris et al.Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Rodionov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Rodionov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Rodionov more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Rodionov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Rodionov. The network helps show where D. Rodionov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Rodionov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Rodionov.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Rodionov based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Rodionov. D. Rodionov is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rodionov, D., Oleg Korablev, Л. М. Зеленый, & Jorge L. Vago. (2017). Mars Atmospheric Measurements Planned at Exomars 2020 Surface Platform. 4407.6 indexed citations
Fleischer, I., G. Klingelhöfer, F. Rull, et al.. (2008). Sulfate minerals from two Mars analogue sites Rio Tinto and Jaroso Ravine, Spain, investigated by Mössbauer and Raman spectroscopy. 907.2 indexed citations
Fleischer, I., G. Klingelhoefer, R. V. Morris, et al.. (2008). Analysis of 6.4 KEV Moessbauer Spectra Obtained with MIMOS II on MER on Cobbles at Meridiani Planum, Mars and Considerations on Penetration Depths. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1618.2 indexed citations
10.
Klingelhöfer, G., D. Rodionov, L. Strüder, et al.. (2008). The Advanced Miniaturised Mössbauer Spectrometer MIMOS IIA: Increased Sensitivity and New Capability of Elemental Analysis. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 1–2.2 indexed citations
11.
Fleischer, I., D. Rodionov, R. V. Morris, et al.. (2007). The MER Mossbauer Spectrometers: 40 Months of Operation on the Martian Surface. 553.1 indexed citations
12.
Schröder, Christian, R. Gellert, B. L. Jolliff, et al.. (2006). A Stony Meteorite Discovered by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity on Meridiani Planum, Mars. Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement. 41. 5285.4 indexed citations
Schröder, Christian, G. Klingelhöfer, R. V. Morris, et al.. (2005). Weathering of Basaltic Rocks from the Gusev Plains up into the Columbia Hills from the Perspective of the MER Mossbauer Spectrometer. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 2309.4 indexed citations
17.
Rodionov, D., R. V. Morris, B. Bernhardt, et al.. (2004). Mössbauer Investigation of `Bounce Rock' at Meridiani Planum on Mars -- Indications for the First Shergottite on Mars. M&PSA. 39. 5219.2 indexed citations
18.
Klingelhöfer, G., R. V. Morris, B. Bernhardt, et al.. (2004). Jarosite and Hematite at Meridiani Planum from Opportunity's Mossbauer Spectrometer. Science. 306(5702). 1740–1745.592 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.