Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A three-dimensional plasma and energetic particle investigation for the wind spacecraft
1995642 citationsR. P. Lin, K. A. Anderson et al.profile →
Magnetic Field and Plasma Observations at Mars: Initial Results of the Mars Global Surveyor Mission
1998576 citationsR. P. Lin, K. A. Anderson et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of C. d’Uston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. d’Uston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. d’Uston more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. d’Uston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. d’Uston. The network helps show where C. d’Uston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. d’Uston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. d’Uston.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. d’Uston based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. d’Uston. C. d’Uston is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Klingelhoefer, G., et al.. (2015). The Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer APXS on the Rosetta lander Philae to explore the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. EGUGA. 13614.1 indexed citations
2.
Gasnault, O., O. Forni, Pierre‐Yves Meslin, et al.. (2013). CHEMCAM TARGET CLASSIFICATION: WHO'S WHO FROM CURIOSITY'S FIRST NINETY SOLS.. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1994.1 indexed citations
3.
Yamashita, N., O. Gasnault, O. Forni, et al.. (2010). Observation of Elemental Compositions on the Moon by the Kaguya Gamma-Ray Spectrometer. 580.1 indexed citations
4.
Klingelhoefer, G., et al.. (2010). The Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer APXS on the Rosetta lander Philae to explore the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. cosp. 38. 9.
5.
Gasnault, O., O. Forni, C. d’Uston, et al.. (2009). Preliminary Analysis of SELENE GRS Data -- The Iron Case. LPI. 2253.4 indexed citations
6.
Gasnault, O., et al.. (2008). Mars Odyssey GRS Results at the Cerberus Plains. LPI. 1642.1 indexed citations
7.
Berger, Gilles, E. Tréguier, C. d’Uston, P. Pinet, & M. J. Toplis. (2008). The Role of Volcanic Sour Gas on the Alteration of Martian Basalt: Insights from Geochemical Modeling. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1809.2 indexed citations
8.
Herkenhoff, K. E., Jack D. Farmer, R. Greeley, et al.. (2008). Diversity of Soil Textures Along Spirit's Traverse in Gusev Crater. AGUFM. 2008.1 indexed citations
9.
Tréguier, E., C. d’Uston, O. Gasnault, et al.. (2007). Investigating Geochemical Relationships Between Martian Soils and Rocks. LPI. 1730.1 indexed citations
10.
Tréguier, E., C. d’Uston, & R. Gellert. (2006). Principal Component Analysis of Geochemical Data at Gusev Crater. 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1956.1 indexed citations
11.
Gasnault, O., S. Maurice, C. d’Uston, W. C. Feldman, & W. V. Boynton. (2005). Comparison of Three Hydrogen Distributions at the Equator of Mars. 36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2318.1 indexed citations
12.
d’Uston, C., et al.. (2005). Performance Limits of New Generation Scintillators for Planetary Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy. LPI. 2187.2 indexed citations
13.
Kobayashi, Masanori, A. A. Berezhnoy, C. d’Uston, et al.. (2005). Global Mapping of Elemental Abundance on Lunar Surface by SELENE Gamma-Ray Spectrometer. 36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2092.4 indexed citations
14.
Boynton, W. V., W. C. Feldman, И. Г. Митрофанов, et al.. (2002). Early Results of the Mars Odyssey Gamma-Ray Spectrometer (GRS): Ice and Other Cool Stuff. M&PSA. 37.1 indexed citations
15.
Evlanov, E. N., et al.. (1991). Mossbauer Backscatter Spectrometer for Mineralogical Analysis of the Mars Surface for Mars-94 Mission. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 22. 361.2 indexed citations
16.
Klingelhöfer, G., J. Foh, P. Held, et al.. (1991). Mössbauer Spectroscopy on the Surface of Mars. LPICo. 28. 90.5 indexed citations
17.
Mitchell, D. L., R. P. Lin, K. A. Anderson, et al.. (1989). The composition of heavy molecular ions inside the ionopause of comet Halley.. 135. 451–452.1 indexed citations
18.
Rème, H., J. A. Sauvaud, C. d’Uston, et al.. (1987). General Features of Comet p/ Halley - Solar Wind Interaction from Plasma Measurements. A&A. 187. 33.22 indexed citations
19.
d’Uston, C., H. Rème, J. A. Sauvaud, et al.. (1986). Description of the main boundaries seen by the Giotto electron experiment inside the Comet Halley-solar wind interaction regions. 250. 77–80.1 indexed citations
20.
Anderson, K. A., C. W. Carlson, D. W. Curtis, et al.. (1986). The upstream region, foreshock and bow shock wave at Halley's Comet from plasma electron measurements. 250. 259–261.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.