D. L. Visser
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Horticulture top 5%
- Co-authors
- T.J.L. van HintumA.P.M. den NijsRoeland E. VoorripsB. VosmanJ.B.M. CustersM.J.M. SmuldersJan De RiekChristiane M. Ritz
- Topics
- Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (5 papers)Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (3 papers)Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
D. L. Visser
19 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Plant Science 427
- Molecular Biology 244
- Genetics 167
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 136
- Horticulture 28
Countries citing papers authored by D. L. Visser
This map shows the geographic impact of D. L. Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. L. Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. L. Visser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. L. Visser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. L. Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. L. Visser. The network helps show where D. L. Visser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. L. Visser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. L. Visser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. L. Visser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. L. Visser. D. L. Visser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 145 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | Perspectieven voor betere zaadkwaliteit en entbaarheid van de komkommeronderstam Sicyos angulatus | 1 |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | Improving fertility of tetraploid cucumbers | 1 |
| 13 | Monogenic inheritance of andromonoecy in tetraploid Cucumis ficifolius A. Rich | 1 |
| 14 | Variation for interspecific crossability of Cucumis anguria L. and C. zeyheri Sond | 2 |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | Rectification of the names of certain accessions of the IVT-cucumis Collection | 4 |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | The Cucumis species collection at the IVT | 5 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About D. L. Visser
D. L. Visser is a scholar working on Horticulture, Plant Science and Forestry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (5 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (3 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (28 citations), Plant Science (427 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (136 citations). D. L. Visser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include T.J.L. van Hintum, A.P.M. den Nijs, Roeland E. Voorrips, B. Vosman, J.B.M. Custers, M.J.M. Smulders, Jan De Riek, Christiane M. Ritz, Hilde Nybom and G. Werlemark. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, American Journal of Botany and Euphytica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.