D. L. Shankland
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Mark E. SchroederJonathan A. RoseRobert M. HollingworthAlbert E. LundL. A. CrowderR JohnG.K.W. YimKeith E. Cooksey
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
D. L. Shankland
21 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 196
- Insect Science 190
- Molecular Biology 99
- Plant Science 97
- Genetics 75
Countries citing papers authored by D. L. Shankland
This map shows the geographic impact of D. L. Shankland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. L. Shankland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. L. Shankland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. L. Shankland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. L. Shankland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. L. Shankland. The network helps show where D. L. Shankland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. L. Shankland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. L. Shankland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. L. Shankland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. L. Shankland. D. L. Shankland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | An automated assay for serum ferritin. | 2 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 82 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Cyanide tolerance in millipedes: comparison of respiration im millipedes and insects. | 2 |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About D. L. Shankland
D. L. Shankland is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 21 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (190 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (196 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (38 citations). D. L. Shankland has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Schroeder, Jonathan A. Rose, Robert M. Hollingworth, Albert E. Lund, L. A. Crowder, R John, G.K.W. Yim, Keith E. Cooksey, C. Donninger and J. R. Norris. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry, Life Sciences and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.