D. Jane Bower

470 total citations
27 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

D. Jane Bower is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Jane Bower has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Strategy and Management, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in D. Jane Bower's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (6 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (6 papers). D. Jane Bower is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (6 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (6 papers). D. Jane Bower collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and China. D. Jane Bower's co-authors include William Keogh, Andrew Young, John Norrie, Margaret Reid, Sarah Jack, H.D. Wright, Cliff Hardcastle, Tracy Ibbotson, John Hinks and Penny K. Campbell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Product Innovation Management, International Journal of Project Management and Long Range Planning.

In The Last Decade

D. Jane Bower

27 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D. Jane Bower United Kingdom	13	201	99	74	37	34	27	316
Isidre March-Chordà Spain	9	135 0.7×	109 1.1×	72 1.0×	38 1.0×	7 0.2×	24	263
Jeffrey R. Immelt	2	150 0.7×	119 1.2×	97 1.3×	7 0.2×	13 0.4×	2	363
Christopher Boerner United States	6	175 0.9×	55 0.6×	85 1.1×	19 0.5×	5 0.1×	8	273
Daniela Baglieri Italy	11	169 0.8×	172 1.7×	107 1.4×	12 0.3×	8 0.2×	23	344
Chris Welter United States	10	139 0.7×	202 2.0×	59 0.8×	22 0.6×	12 0.4×	20	374
Sadao Nagaoka Japan	13	208 1.0×	185 1.9×	230 3.1×	22 0.6×	13 0.4×	39	448
Esin Yoruk United Kingdom	9	134 0.7×	135 1.4×	178 2.4×	16 0.4×	8 0.2×	17	372
Najib Harabi Switzerland	6	249 1.2×	200 2.0×	260 3.5×	19 0.5×	8 0.2×	18	446
Hugo Alberto Colombia	3	144 0.7×	38 0.4×	30 0.4×	30 0.8×	5 0.1×	9	240
Étienne Pfister France	7	252 1.3×	81 0.8×	175 2.4×	16 0.4×	4 0.1×	19	357

Countries citing papers authored by D. Jane Bower

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Jane Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Jane Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Jane Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Jane Bower

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Jane Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Jane Bower. The network helps show where D. Jane Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Jane Bower

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Jane Bower. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Jane Bower based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Jane Bower. D. Jane Bower is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (2007). The Indian Challenge: The Evolution of a Successful New Global Strategy in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 19(5). 611–624. 15 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (2006). Academic spin-outs: the journey from idea to credible proposition a combination of knowledge exchange, knowledge transfer and knowledge translation. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 1(1/2). 90–90. 3 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (2006). SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL FORMATION IN LEADING INDIAN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES. International Journal of Innovation Management. 10(4). 407–423. 7 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (2005). Designing and Implementing E-health Applications in the UK's National Health Service. Journal of Health Communication. 10(8). 733–750. 15 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane. (2005). From the ‘rhetoric of hope’ to the ‘patient-active paradigm’—strategic positioning of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 17(2). 183–204. 3 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane. (2003). Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R and D Management. 33(2). 97–106. 1 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (2001). ICTs, videoconferencing and the construction industry: opportunity or threat?. Construction Innovation. 1(2). 129–144. 8 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane. (2000). Aligning Process and Meaning Innovating in Complex Healthcare Delivery Systems. International Journal of Innovation Management. 4(3). 299–317. 6 indexed citations

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (2000). Manufacturing strategies of small technology-based firms in the UK oil industry. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management. 1(4/5). 455–455. 5 indexed citations

10.

Keogh, William, et al.. (1998). Small, Technology-based Firms in the UK Oil and Gas Industry: Innovation and Internationalisation Strategies. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship. 17(1). 57–72. 14 indexed citations

11.

Keogh, William & D. Jane Bower. (1997). Total quality management and innovation: A pilot study of innovative companies in the oil and gas industry. Total Quality Management. 8(2-3). 196–201. 13 indexed citations

12.

Bower, D. Jane & William Keogh. (1997). Conflict and Co-Operation in Technology-Based Alliances. International Journal of Innovation Management. 1(4). 387–409. 12 indexed citations

13.

Bower, D. Jane, John Brebner, John Cairns, et al.. (1997). When is the right time to initiate an assessment of a health technology?. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 3(1_suppl). 97–97. 1 indexed citations

14.

Bower, D. Jane. (1996). User-producer Interaction and the Case of Biomedical Innovation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 3(1). 21–34. 5 indexed citations

15.

Bower, D. Jane & Andrew Young. (1995). Influences on technology strategy in the uk oil- and gas-related industry network. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 7(4). 407–416. 12 indexed citations

16.

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (1994). A shift to external alliances for product development in the pharmaceutical industry. R and D Management. 24(3). 249–260. 34 indexed citations

17.

Bower, D. Jane, et al.. (1993). Global R&D networks. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1(1). 50–64. 15 indexed citations

18.

Bower, D. Jane. (1993). New product development in the pharmaceutical industry: Pooling network resources. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 10(5). 367–375. 26 indexed citations

19.

Bower, D. Jane. (1993). Successful joint ventures in Science Parks. Long Range Planning. 26(6). 114–120. 45 indexed citations

20.

Bower, D. Jane. (1993). New technology supply networks in the global pharmaceutical industry. International Business Review. 2(1). 83–95. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact