D. Hofman
- Surgery
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Topics
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (13 papers)Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (7 papers)Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
D. Hofman
21 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Surgery 183
- Rehabilitation 113
- Occupational Therapy 91
- Internal Medicine 57
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 40
Countries citing papers authored by D. Hofman
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Hofman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Hofman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Hofman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Hofman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Hofman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Hofman. The network helps show where D. Hofman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Hofman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Hofman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Hofman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Hofman. D. Hofman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | How should we approach pain management in wound care | 1 |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | Assessing pain at wound dressing-related procedures. | 16 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | Cost and dressing evaluation of hydrofiber and alginate dressings in the mManagement of community-based patients with chronic leg ulceration | 22 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 108 | |
| 13 | Bandaging in the treatment of venous ulcers: a European view. | 5 |
| 14 | Assessing and managing pain in leg ulcers. | 4 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Know how: a guide to wound debridement. | 2 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | [2 cases of Kartagener's syndrome in children]. | 1 |
About D. Hofman
D. Hofman is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (13 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (7 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (91 citations), Rehabilitation (113 citations) and Internal Medicine (57 citations). D. Hofman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include G.W. Cherry, Tammy Ryan, F. Arnold, M Bjellerup, C. J. Glynn, C. Lindholm, K. Moore, Michelle Eagle, Susan Burge and Susan M. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Respiratory Research, Clinical Rheumatology and Journal of Wound Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.