D. H. Wiles
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- T. KolakowskaRobin G. McCreadieA. S. McNeillyMichael GelderJohn R. PatersonB. M. MandelbroteLesley RobertsonG. Campbell
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (21 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
D. H. Wiles
25 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Psychiatry and Mental health 570
- Clinical Psychology 137
- Biological Psychiatry 119
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 85
- Philosophy 81
Countries citing papers authored by D. H. Wiles
This map shows the geographic impact of D. H. Wiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. H. Wiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. H. Wiles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. H. Wiles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. H. Wiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. H. Wiles. The network helps show where D. H. Wiles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. H. Wiles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. H. Wiles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. H. Wiles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. H. Wiles. D. H. Wiles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 63 | |
| 4 | 69 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | Clinical significance of plasma chlorpromazine levels. II. Plasma levels of the drug, some of its metabolites and prolactin in patients receiving long-term phenothiazine treatment. | 52 |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About D. H. Wiles
D. H. Wiles is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Biochemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (21 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (119 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (570 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (34 citations). D. H. Wiles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include T. Kolakowska, Robin G. McCreadie, A. S. McNeilly, Michael Gelder, John R. Paterson, B. M. Mandelbrote, Lesley Robertson, G. Campbell, P. W. Kershaw and J. A. G. Watt. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Clinical Chemistry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.