D. A. I. Groffen
- Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Hans BosmaJ. Th. M. van EijkMarjan van den AkkerGertrudis I. J. M. KempenAnnemarie KosterFrans E. S. TanLloyd BrandtsInge Houkes
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (17 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
D. A. I. Groffen
22 papers receiving 276 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Health 135
- General Health Professions 120
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- Social Psychology 42
- Clinical Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by D. A. I. Groffen
This map shows the geographic impact of D. A. I. Groffen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. A. I. Groffen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. A. I. Groffen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. A. I. Groffen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. A. I. Groffen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. A. I. Groffen. The network helps show where D. A. I. Groffen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. A. I. Groffen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. A. I. Groffen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. A. I. Groffen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. A. I. Groffen. D. A. I. Groffen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | The socioeconomic patterning of perceived stress and hair cortisol in Dutch 10-12 year olds | 3 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About D. A. I. Groffen
D. A. I. Groffen is a scholar working on Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (17 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (135 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations) and General Health Professions (120 citations). D. A. I. Groffen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans Bosma, J. Th. M. van Eijk, Marjan van den Akker, Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen, Annemarie Koster, Frans E. S. Tan, Lloyd Brandts, Inge Houkes, Ivonne P. M. Derks and Thor Aspelund. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMC Public Health and American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.