Cynthia C. Woo
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael LeonBrett A. JohnsonEdna E. HingcoRobert CoopersmithRobin Steinberg-EpsteinJoseph H. DonnellyJoseph NajbauerCharles E. Ribak
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (19 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cynthia C. Woo
22 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Sensory Systems 674
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 527
- Nutrition and Dietetics 385
- Cognitive Neuroscience 230
- Social Psychology 166
Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia C. Woo
This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia C. Woo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia C. Woo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia C. Woo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia C. Woo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia C. Woo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia C. Woo. The network helps show where Cynthia C. Woo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia C. Woo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia C. Woo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia C. Woo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia C. Woo. Cynthia C. Woo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 91 | |
| 6 | 124 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 81 | |
| 10 | 135 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 72 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 83 | |
| 19 | 99 | |
| 20 | Temporal characteristics of the enhanced neural response following odor experience in rats | 1 |
About Cynthia C. Woo
Cynthia C. Woo is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (19 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (674 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (527 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (385 citations). Cynthia C. Woo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Leon, Brett A. Johnson, Edna E. Hingco, Robert Coopersmith, Robin Steinberg-Epstein, Joseph H. Donnelly, Joseph Najbauer, Charles E. Ribak, Xiao‐Xin Yan and Khashayar Dashtipour. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Brain Research and Neuroreport.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.