Cynthia Brown

401 total citations
12 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

Cynthia Brown is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Cynthia Brown has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Health and 7 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Cynthia Brown's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (6 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers). Cynthia Brown is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (6 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers). Cynthia Brown collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Cynthia Brown's co-authors include Kelsey Hegarty, Pauleen C. Bennett, Tim Godber, Joshua Trigg, Michael Flood, Lena Sanci, Tiffani J. Howell, Pinar Thorn, Renee Fiolet and Dana McKay and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Aggression and Violent Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Cynthia Brown

9 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Cynthia Brown
Andrew Ninnemann United States
Laurie Ragatz United States
Christopher Blazina United States
Heather A. Love United States
Michelle Newberry United Kingdom
Gabrielle Maxwell New Zealand
Jennifer Murphy United States
Elisabeth Reichert United States
Hanne K. Collins United States
Eileen Vizard United Kingdom
Andrew Ninnemann United States
Cynthia Brown
Citations per year, relative to Cynthia Brown Cynthia Brown (= 1×) peers Andrew Ninnemann

Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Brown. The network helps show where Cynthia Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia Brown. Cynthia Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Brown, Cynthia, et al.. (2025). Development and Validation of the Psychological Abuse in Relationships Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 365572056–365572056.
3.
Brown, Cynthia & Kelsey Hegarty. (2024). Fear and Distress: How Can We Measure the Impact of Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships?. Social Sciences. 13(1). 71–71.
4.
Brown, Cynthia, Renee Fiolet, Dana McKay, & Bridget Harris. (2023). Exploring the use of story completion to understand the perpetration of technology-facilitated abuse in relationships. Qualitative Research Journal. 23(5). 457–470. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fiolet, Renee, et al.. (2023). Perpetrator Perceptions on the Emotions and Motivations Driving Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships: A Story Completion Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 38(23-24). 11999–12024. 2 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Cynthia, Lena Sanci, & Kelsey Hegarty. (2021). Technology-facilitated abuse in relationships: Victimisation patterns and impact in young people. Computers in Human Behavior. 124. 106897–106897. 25 indexed citations
7.
Brown, Cynthia & Kelsey Hegarty. (2021). Development and validation of the TAR Scale: A measure of technology-facilitated abuse in relationships. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 3. 100059–100059. 22 indexed citations
8.
Fiolet, Renee, et al.. (2021). Exploring the Impact of Technology-Facilitated Abuse and Its Relationship with Domestic Violence: A Qualitative Study on Experts’ Perceptions. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 8. 1662118096–1662118096. 17 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Cynthia, Michael Flood, & Kelsey Hegarty. (2020). Digital dating abuse perpetration and impact: The importance of gender. Journal of Youth Studies. 25(2). 193–208. 30 indexed citations
10.
Brown, Cynthia & Kelsey Hegarty. (2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 40. 44–59. 82 indexed citations
11.
Bennett, Pauleen C., Joshua Trigg, Tim Godber, & Cynthia Brown. (2015). An Experience Sampling Approach to Investigating Associations between Pet Presence and Indicators of Psychological Wellbeing and Mood in Older Australians. Anthrozoös. 28(3). 403–420. 59 indexed citations
12.
Thorn, Pinar, Tiffani J. Howell, Cynthia Brown, & Pauleen C. Bennett. (2015). The Canine Cuteness Effect: Owner-Perceived Cuteness as a Predictor of Human–Dog Relationship Quality. Anthrozoös. 28(4). 569–585. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026