Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using Pedometers to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health
20071.6k citationsDena M Bravata, Crystal Smith-Spangler et al.JAMAprofile →
Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?
2012397 citationsCrystal Smith-Spangler, Margaret L. Brandeau et al.Annals of Internal Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Crystal Smith-Spangler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Crystal Smith-Spangler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crystal Smith-Spangler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crystal Smith-Spangler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Crystal Smith-Spangler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Crystal Smith-Spangler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Crystal Smith-Spangler. The network helps show where Crystal Smith-Spangler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Crystal Smith-Spangler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Crystal Smith-Spangler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Crystal Smith-Spangler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Crystal Smith-Spangler. Crystal Smith-Spangler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McDonald, Kathryn M, Ellen Schultz, Noelle Pineda, et al.. (2014). Care Coordination Atlas Version 4 (Prepared by Stanford University under subcontract to American Institutes for Research on Contract No. HHSA290-2010-00005I).7 indexed citations
3.
Smith-Spangler, Crystal. (2012). ARE ORGANIC FOODS SAFER OR HEALTHIER THAN CONVENTIONAL ALTERNATIVES? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.18 indexed citations
4.
Smith-Spangler, Crystal, Margaret L. Brandeau, J. Clay Bavinger, et al.. (2012). Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives. Annals of Internal Medicine.38 indexed citations
5.
Smith-Spangler, Crystal, Margaret L. Brandeau, J. Clay Bavinger, et al.. (2012). Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?. Annals of Internal Medicine. 157(5). 348–366.397 indexed citations breakdown →
Smith-Spangler, Crystal, Jessie Juusola, Eva A. Enns, et al.. (2010). Desalination of the American Diet: Population Strategies to Decrease Sodium Intake and the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease. Annals of Internal Medicine.1 indexed citations
McDonald, Kathryn M, Ellen Schultz, Noelle Pineda, et al.. (2010). Care Coordination Atlas Version 3.44 indexed citations
10.
Bravata, Dena M, Crystal Smith-Spangler, Vandana Sundaram, et al.. (2008). Using Pedometers to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health.142 indexed citations
11.
Bravata, Dena M, Crystal Smith-Spangler, Vandana Sundaram, et al.. (2007). Using Pedometers to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health. JAMA. 298(19). 2296–2296.1636 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.