Crestina S. Consorti
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Catalysis top 0.5%
- Electrochemistry top 1%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jaı̈rton DupontJohn SpencerRoberto Fernando de SouzaPaulo A. Z. SuarezGünter EbelingFrank MarkenJay D. WadhawanRichard G. Compton
- Topics
- Ionic liquids properties and applications (13 papers)Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (11 papers)Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (6 papers)
- Journals
- Chemical ReviewsJournal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Partner nations
- BrazilGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Crestina S. Consorti
31 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Organic Chemistry 2.2k
- Catalysis 1.2k
- Electrochemistry 534
- Inorganic Chemistry 457
- Materials Chemistry 401
Countries citing papers authored by Crestina S. Consorti
This map shows the geographic impact of Crestina S. Consorti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crestina S. Consorti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crestina S. Consorti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Crestina S. Consorti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Crestina S. Consorti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Crestina S. Consorti. The network helps show where Crestina S. Consorti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Crestina S. Consorti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Crestina S. Consorti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Crestina S. Consorti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Crestina S. Consorti. Crestina S. Consorti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | The Potential of Palladacycles: More Than Just Precatalystsbreakdown → | 1163 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 69 | |
| 12 | 213 | |
| 13 | 112 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 486 | |
| 19 | 121 | |
| 20 | 156 |
About Crestina S. Consorti
Crestina S. Consorti is a scholar working on Catalysis, Pharmaceutical Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionic liquids properties and applications (13 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (11 papers) and Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (1.2k citations), Electrochemistry (534 citations) and Organic Chemistry (2.2k citations). Crestina S. Consorti has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jaı̈rton Dupont, John Spencer, Roberto Fernando de Souza, Paulo A. Z. Suarez, Günter Ebeling, Frank Marken, Jay D. Wadhawan, Richard G. Compton, Uwe Schröder and Leonardo S. Santos. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.