Cressida Fforde
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Jane HubertPaul TurnbullRaymond LovettLawrence BamblettJoe RossLyndon Ormond-ParkerAaron CornBill Sillar
- Topics
- Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (5 papers)Museums and Cultural Heritage (3 papers)Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cressida Fforde
14 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 101
- Health 88
- Archeology 80
- Anthropology 73
- General Health Professions 50
Countries citing papers authored by Cressida Fforde
This map shows the geographic impact of Cressida Fforde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cressida Fforde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cressida Fforde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cressida Fforde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cressida Fforde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cressida Fforde. The network helps show where Cressida Fforde may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cressida Fforde
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cressida Fforde. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cressida Fforde based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cressida Fforde. Cressida Fforde is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Investment in prisons: an investment in social exclusion? Linking the theories of Justice Reinvestment and Social exclusion to examine Australia's propensity to incarcerate | 2 |
| 5 | Information technology and indigenous communities | 16 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 120 | |
| 8 | Investment in prisons: an investment in social exclusion? | 1 |
| 9 | ‘Will the Real Aborigine Please Stand Up?’: Strategies for breaking the stereotypes and changing the conversation | 27 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Conservation, Identity and Ownership in Indigenous Archaeology | 6 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | The dead and their possessions : repatriation in principle, policy and practice | 123 |
| 15 | Repatriation developments in the UK | 7 |
About Cressida Fforde
Cressida Fforde is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Archeology and Museology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (5 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (3 papers) and Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (27 citations), Museology (36 citations) and Health (88 citations). Cressida Fforde has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jane Hubert, Paul Turnbull, Raymond Lovett, Lawrence Bamblett, Joe Ross, Lyndon Ormond-Parker, Aaron Corn, Bill Sillar, Michael Levy and Jill Guthrie. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Computer Review, Journal of sociology and Media International Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.