Cramer

6.1k total citations
4 papers, 26 citations indexed

About

Cramer is a scholar working on Paleontology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Cramer has authored 4 papers receiving a total of 26 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Paleontology, 1 paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 1 paper in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Cramer's work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper). Cramer is often cited by papers focused on Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper). Cramer collaborates with scholars based in . Cramer's co-authors include Bradley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Earth Science and American Control Conference.

In The Last Decade

Cramer

4 papers receiving 17 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cramer 3 12 9 5 4 4 4 26
Peter Stork United Kingdom 5 14 1.2× 8 0.9× 11 2.2× 3 0.8× 9 35
Paul Tannery 3 8 0.7× 5 0.6× 12 2.4× 1 0.3× 8 23
Stephen Ford United Kingdom 3 11 0.9× 6 0.7× 2 0.5× 5 40
Eiluned Rees. United Kingdom 3 5 0.4× 1 0.2× 3 0.8× 3 0.8× 9 32
Edgar J. Goodspeed 3 2 0.2× 6 0.7× 2 0.4× 10 2.5× 23 24
F. K. Cameron Canada 4 4 0.3× 1 0.1× 9 1.8× 5 1.3× 7 29
Karin Margareta Fredborg Denmark 4 2 0.2× 2 0.2× 12 2.4× 8 30
Alan Campbell United Kingdom 2 5 0.4× 3 0.8× 4 12
Michel Banniard France 4 5 0.6× 6 1.2× 26 46
Boniface Kawasha United States 4 2 0.2× 5 1.0× 2 0.5× 7 34

Countries citing papers authored by Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cramer. The network helps show where Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cramer. Cramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
1.
Bradley, et al.. (2008). Preliminary Estimation of Paleoproductivity via TOC and Habitat Types: Which Method Is More Reliable? -A Case Study on the Ordovician-Silurian Transitional Black Shales of the Upper Yangtze Platform, South China. Journal of Earth Science. 19(5). 534–548. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cramer. (1999). Spatio-Temporal Diversity in Ultra-Wideband Radio. 4 indexed citations
3.
Cramer, et al.. (1991). Adaptive Control Using Neural Networks. American Control Conference. 28. 681–686. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cramer. (1954). Astrology in Roman Law and Politics. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026