John Huntington
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Philosophy
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Journals
- Contemporary Literature
In The Last Decade
John Huntington
3 papers receiving 7 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
- Literature and Literary Theory 4
- Philosophy 3
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2
- Sociology and Political Science 2
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2
Countries citing papers authored by John Huntington
This map shows the geographic impact of John Huntington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Huntington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Huntington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Huntington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Huntington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Huntington. The network helps show where John Huntington may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Critical essays on H.G. Wells | 3 |
| 3 | 5 |
About John Huntington
John Huntington is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 3 papers that have together received 11 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (4 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (1 citation) and Philosophy (3 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.