Craig Wright

26 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Craig Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 35
  • Rehabilitation 47
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 91
  • Cell Biology 70
  • Physiology 97
Replace Maha M. Hammad with:
Maha M. Hammad Kuwait
Tsutomu Inamizu Japan
Mark Nixon United Kingdom
Samia Warsame Kuwait
Cristina de Álvaro Spain
Anna Baran Poland
Brigitte Arends Netherlands
Wencan Xu China
Ricardo Márquez-Velasco Mexico
Eri Oyanagi Japan
Craig Wright relative to Maha M. Hammad Kuwait Maha M. Hammad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Maha M. Hammad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Wright. The network helps show where Craig Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Craig Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig Wright Line = papers co-authored together Craig Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200980
2 201870
3 201657
4 201730
5 201826
6 201426
7 201725
8 201721
9 201420
10 201818
11 201415
12 201514
13 202014
14 20209
15 19987
16 20226
17
The Official CHFI Study Guide
20075
18 20225
19 20235
20 20224

About Craig Wright

Craig Wright is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, Genetics and Cell Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (9 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (8 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (7 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (7 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers), Selenium in Biological Systems (3 papers) and Hematological disorders and diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (35 citations), Rehabilitation (47 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (91 citations), Cell Biology (70 citations) and Physiology (97 citations). Craig Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aaron P. Russell, Alister C. Ward, Nicole Stupka, Clifford Liongue, Chris van der Poel, Sof Andrikopoulos, Anne I. Turner, Dana Lee Olstad, Kylie Ball and Gavin Abbott. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Biology of Sport, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and Journal of science and medicine in sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact