Craig Erker
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Sébastien Perreault (7 shared papers)Kathryn E. Flynn (1 shared paper)Liyun Zhang (1 shared paper)Daddy Mata‐Mbemba (6 shared papers)Julie A. Panepinto (1 shared paper)Ke Yan (1 shared paper)Kristin Bingen (1 shared paper)Benjamin Ellezam (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuro-Oncology (6 papers)Neuro-Oncology Advances (5 papers)Future Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (1 paper)BMC Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Craig Erker
22 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Genetics 171
- Neurology 127
- Microbiology 3
- Medical Terminology 1
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 58
Countries citing papers authored by Craig Erker
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Erker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Erker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Erker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Erker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Erker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Erker. The network helps show where Craig Erker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Craig Erker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1 |
About Craig Erker
Craig Erker is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Epidemiology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (10 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Renal and related cancers (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (171 citations), Neurology (127 citations), Microbiology (3 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (58 citations). Craig Erker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sébastien Perreault, Kathryn E. Flynn, Liyun Zhang, Daddy Mata‐Mbemba, Julie A. Panepinto, Ke Yan, Kristin Bingen, Benjamin Ellezam, Nada Jabado and Éric Bouffet. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Neuro-Oncology Advances, Future Oncology, Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and BMC Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.