Craig Citro
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Hardware and Architecture top 10%
- Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Papers in
-
- Advanced Algebra and Geometry 1
-
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Kurt Smith (1 shared paper)Lisandro Dalcín (1 shared paper)D. S. Seljebotn (1 shared paper)Robert Bradshaw (1 shared paper)Stefan Behnel (1 shared paper)Yvan Vandenplas (1 shared paper)Silvia Salvatore (1 shared paper)Bruno Hauser (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (1 paper)Computing in Science & Engineering (1 paper)International Mathematics Research Notices (1 paper)Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyNorway
In The Last Decade
Craig Citro
4 papers receiving 699 citations
Craig Citro's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Instrumentation 40
- Hardware and Architecture 71
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 141
- Structural Biology 7
- Artificial Intelligence 153
Countries citing papers authored by Craig Citro
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Citro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Citro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Citro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Citro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Citro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Citro. The network helps show where Craig Citro may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Craig Citro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cython: The Best of Both Worlds Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 719 |
| 2 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 1 |
About Craig Citro
Craig Citro is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Hardware and Architecture, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 4 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (1 paper), Polynomial and algebraic computation (1 paper), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (1 paper), Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (1 paper) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (40 citations), Hardware and Architecture (71 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (141 citations), Structural Biology (7 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (153 citations). Craig Citro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Smith, Lisandro Dalcín, D. S. Seljebotn, Robert Bradshaw, Stefan Behnel, Yvan Vandenplas, Silvia Salvatore, Bruno Hauser, Serena Arrigo and Alessandro Salvatoni. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Computing in Science & Engineering, International Mathematics Research Notices and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.