Craig Cessford

88 total papers · 1.3k total citations
44 papers, 497 citations indexed

About

Craig Cessford is a scholar working on Archeology, Anthropology and Paleontology. According to data from OpenAlex, Craig Cessford has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 497 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Archeology, 16 papers in Anthropology and 13 papers in Paleontology. Recurrent topics in Craig Cessford's work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (13 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (13 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (13 papers). Craig Cessford is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (13 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (13 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (13 papers). Craig Cessford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Estonia. Craig Cessford's co-authors include Ian Hodder, Sarah A. Inskip, John Robb, Piers D. Mitchell, Toomas Kivisild, Christiana L. Scheib, Tristan Carter, Alice Rose, Tamsin C. O’Connell and Benjamin Neil and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, Scientific Reports and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Craig Cessford

38 papers receiving 443 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Craig Cessford 252 231 159 90 44 44 497
Andrey Epimakhov 383 1.5× 231 1.0× 258 1.6× 85 0.9× 50 1.1× 49 530
José Luis Lanata 244 1.0× 157 0.7× 314 2.0× 53 0.6× 25 0.6× 41 501
Stephan Naji 214 0.8× 267 1.2× 132 0.8× 102 1.1× 46 1.0× 20 554
Amaia Arranz‐Otaegui 319 1.3× 198 0.9× 194 1.2× 34 0.4× 104 2.4× 32 578
Sylvia Alejandra Jiménez Brobeil 234 0.9× 446 1.9× 123 0.8× 59 0.7× 53 1.2× 70 605
Martine Vercauteren 143 0.6× 191 0.8× 40 0.3× 77 0.9× 29 0.7× 66 527
Rebecca Storey 289 1.1× 199 0.9× 151 0.9× 39 0.4× 81 1.8× 28 511
Thomas F. Strasser 271 1.1× 305 1.3× 168 1.1× 18 0.2× 31 0.7× 19 468
Iwona Sobkowiak‐Tabaka 203 0.8× 144 0.6× 122 0.8× 52 0.6× 38 0.9× 51 475
Dougald O’Reilly 295 1.2× 296 1.3× 62 0.4× 39 0.4× 153 3.5× 49 535

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Cessford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Cessford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Cessford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Cessford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Cessford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Cessford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Cessford. The network helps show where Craig Cessford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Cessford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Cessford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Cessford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Cessford. Craig Cessford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026