Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Attribution and the psychology of prediction.
1975418 citationsRichard E. Nisbett, Eugene BorgidaJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Sex stereotypes and social judgment.
1980396 citationsEugene Borgida et al.Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions1
1977388 citationsEugene Borgida, Richard E. Nisbettprofile →
Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination.
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene Borgida
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene Borgida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene Borgida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene Borgida more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene Borgida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene Borgida. The network helps show where Eugene Borgida may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene Borgida
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene Borgida.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene Borgida based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene Borgida. Eugene Borgida is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fisher, Emily L., et al.. (2011). Attitudes toward immigrants: The interactive role of social norms, personal values, and the authoritarian predisposition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48.4 indexed citations
Borgida, Eugene & Susan T. Fiske. (2007). Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom. Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks.86 indexed citations
Borgida, Eugene, et al.. (2005). On the Use of Gender Stereotyping Research in Sex Discrimination Litigation. eYLS (Yale Law School). 13(2). 6.9 indexed citations
14.
Hunt, Jennifer S. & Eugene Borgida. (2001). Is that what I said. Law and Human Behavior. 25(6).4 indexed citations
15.
Riedel, Eric, et al.. (2000). Electronic communities: assessing equality of access in a rural Minnesota community. 86–108.3 indexed citations
16.
Thomsen, Cynthia J., Eugene Borgida, & Howard Lavine. (1995). The Causes and Consequences of Personal Involvement.54 indexed citations
17.
Miene, Peter, et al.. (1992). Juror Decision Making and the Evaluation of Hearsay Evidence. Minnesota law review. 76. 683.17 indexed citations
18.
Swim, Janet K., Eugene Borgida, Geoffrey Maruyama, & David G. Myers. (1989). Joan McKay Versus John McKay. Psychological Bulletin. 105(3).2 indexed citations
19.
Borgida, Eugene & Richard E. Nisbett. (1977). The Differential Impact of Abstract vs. Concrete Information on Decisions. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).11 indexed citations
20.
Nisbett, Richard E. & Eugene Borgida. (1975). Attribution and the psychology of prediction.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 32(5). 932–943.418 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.