Cornelius M. Kerwin

426 total citations
11 papers, 211 citations indexed

About

Cornelius M. Kerwin is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Cornelius M. Kerwin has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 211 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Strategy and Management, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Cornelius M. Kerwin's work include Regulation and Compliance Studies (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers). Cornelius M. Kerwin is often cited by papers focused on Regulation and Compliance Studies (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers). Cornelius M. Kerwin collaborates with scholars based in United States. Cornelius M. Kerwin's co-authors include Scott R. Furlong, Laura Langbein, William F. West and Thomas A. Henderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Public Administration Review, The Journal of Politics and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

In The Last Decade

Cornelius M. Kerwin

9 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cornelius M. Kerwin United States 6 118 65 65 54 43 11 211
Colin S. Diver United States 7 78 0.7× 58 0.9× 32 0.5× 94 1.7× 48 1.1× 10 257
Roland Czada Germany 7 56 0.5× 128 2.0× 45 0.7× 35 0.6× 51 1.2× 30 221
Eva G. Heidbreder Germany 10 65 0.6× 155 2.4× 29 0.4× 15 0.3× 33 0.8× 22 222
Andrea C. Bianculli Spain 9 96 0.8× 76 1.2× 29 0.4× 25 0.5× 45 1.0× 22 191
Jonathan C. Kamkhaji United Kingdom 7 50 0.4× 144 2.2× 75 1.2× 25 0.5× 61 1.4× 15 230
Terence Daintith United Kingdom 8 46 0.4× 57 0.9× 15 0.2× 37 0.7× 42 1.0× 31 156
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung 8 39 0.3× 51 0.8× 13 0.2× 30 0.6× 73 1.7× 14 193
Gunnar Folke Schuppert Germany 9 40 0.3× 96 1.5× 26 0.4× 12 0.2× 71 1.7× 44 213
Thorsten Benner United Kingdom 9 52 0.4× 181 2.8× 33 0.5× 22 0.4× 157 3.7× 25 328
Ulf Sverdrup Norway 7 119 1.0× 260 4.0× 32 0.5× 20 0.4× 37 0.9× 22 320

Countries citing papers authored by Cornelius M. Kerwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelius M. Kerwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelius M. Kerwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelius M. Kerwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelius M. Kerwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelius M. Kerwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelius M. Kerwin. The network helps show where Cornelius M. Kerwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cornelius M. Kerwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cornelius M. Kerwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cornelius M. Kerwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cornelius M. Kerwin. Cornelius M. Kerwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Kerwin, Cornelius M. & Scott R. Furlong. (2025). Rulemaking.
2.
Kerwin, Cornelius M. & Scott R. Furlong. (2019). Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. CQ Press eBooks. 55 indexed citations
3.
Henderson, Thomas A. & Cornelius M. Kerwin. (2016). THE CHANGING CHARACTER OF COURT ORGANIZATION. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kerwin, Cornelius M., Scott R. Furlong, & William F. West. (2010). Interest Groups, Rulemaking, and American Bureaucracy. Oxford University Press eBooks. 14 indexed citations
5.
Langbein, Laura & Cornelius M. Kerwin. (2000). Regulatory Negotiation versus Conventional Rule Making: Claims, Counterclaims, and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 10(3). 599–632. 52 indexed citations
6.
Kerwin, Cornelius M. & Scott R. Furlong. (1992). Time and Rulemaking: An Empirical Test of Theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 48 indexed citations
7.
Kerwin, Cornelius M.. (1990). Transforming Regulation: A Case Study of Hydropower Licensing. Public Administration Review. 50(1). 91–91. 16 indexed citations
8.
Langbein, Laura & Cornelius M. Kerwin. (1987). AN ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING COMPLEXITY IN PUBLIC BUREAUS. Review of Policy Research. 7(1). 26–42. 1 indexed citations
9.
Langbein, Laura & Cornelius M. Kerwin. (1985). Implementation, Negotiation and Compliance in Environmental and Safety Regulation. The Journal of Politics. 47(3). 854–880. 22 indexed citations
10.
Kerwin, Cornelius M., et al.. (1984). Management and organizational assessments: a review of selected organizations. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
11.
Kerwin, Cornelius M., et al.. (1980). RESOURCE ESTIMATION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND POLICY OPTIMIZATION. Policy Studies Journal. 8(7). 1070–1078. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026