Constance T. Gager

27 total papers · 996 total citations
18 papers, 712 citations indexed

About

Constance T. Gager is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Constance T. Gager has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 712 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Gender Studies and 8 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Constance T. Gager's work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers). Constance T. Gager is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers). Constance T. Gager collaborates with scholars based in United States and Cameroon. Constance T. Gager's co-authors include Laura Sánchez, Scott T. Yabiku, Kathleen Thiede Call, Teresa M. Cooney, Amanda M. White, Herbert L. Smith, S. Philip Morgan, Sara E. Goldstein, Bryndl Hohmann‐Marriott and John F. Gunn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management Studies, Journal of Marriage and the Family and Social Science Research.

In The Last Decade

Constance T. Gager

17 papers receiving 635 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Constance T. Gager 463 275 245 225 113 18 712
Heather Juby 403 0.9× 135 0.5× 281 1.1× 148 0.7× 227 2.0× 19 663
Chin-Chun Yi 433 0.9× 155 0.6× 231 0.9× 162 0.7× 187 1.7× 33 722
Man Singh Das 525 1.1× 194 0.7× 201 0.8× 158 0.7× 154 1.4× 21 862
Jeanne M. Hilton 428 0.9× 140 0.5× 242 1.0× 213 0.9× 141 1.2× 28 728
Anne Rankin Mahoney 433 0.9× 170 0.6× 145 0.6× 223 1.0× 208 1.8× 30 777
Geoffrey K. Leigh 311 0.7× 178 0.6× 270 1.1× 207 0.9× 223 2.0× 32 771
Sarah Badger 475 1.0× 93 0.3× 229 0.9× 353 1.6× 214 1.9× 11 889
Jennifer Reid Keene 438 0.9× 166 0.6× 164 0.7× 123 0.5× 141 1.2× 33 726
Sharon Price‐Bonham 334 0.7× 143 0.5× 254 1.0× 162 0.7× 234 2.1× 26 660
Deniz Yücel 529 1.1× 181 0.7× 114 0.5× 295 1.3× 260 2.3× 44 852

Countries citing papers authored by Constance T. Gager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance T. Gager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance T. Gager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance T. Gager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance T. Gager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance T. Gager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance T. Gager. The network helps show where Constance T. Gager may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constance T. Gager

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constance T. Gager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constance T. Gager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Constance T. Gager. Constance T. Gager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026