Constance S. Royden

1.5k total citations
27 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Constance S. Royden is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Constance S. Royden has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 6 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Constance S. Royden's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (13 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Constance S. Royden is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (24 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (13 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Constance S. Royden collaborates with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Constance S. Royden's co-authors include Martin S. Banks, James A. Crowell, Ellen C. Hildreth, Jack M. H. Beusmans, Jeremy M. Wolfe, Erwin R. Boer, John Watson, Claes von Hofsten, Jennifer L. Stephan and Franklyn Turbak and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Constance S. Royden

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Constance S. Royden United States 17 1.1k 361 159 153 143 27 1.2k
John A. Perrone New Zealand 20 1.1k 1.0× 305 0.8× 115 0.7× 98 0.6× 184 1.3× 54 1.4k
Scott Watamaniuk United States 21 1.6k 1.5× 356 1.0× 178 1.1× 201 1.3× 227 1.6× 53 1.8k
Satoshi Shioiri Japan 20 997 0.9× 278 0.8× 117 0.7× 156 1.0× 214 1.5× 112 1.3k
Edward A. Essock United States 23 795 0.7× 459 1.3× 283 1.8× 96 0.6× 102 0.7× 51 1.6k
Mark Nawrot United States 18 976 0.9× 184 0.5× 177 1.1× 245 1.6× 123 0.9× 45 1.1k
R. Blake United States 14 1.5k 1.4× 138 0.4× 146 0.9× 231 1.5× 210 1.5× 29 1.8k
Benjamin T. Backus United States 19 1.8k 1.7× 238 0.7× 252 1.6× 326 2.1× 218 1.5× 77 2.0k
Teng Leng Ooi United States 21 1.4k 1.3× 275 0.8× 199 1.3× 305 2.0× 355 2.5× 65 1.7k
Bosco S. Tjan United States 27 2.1k 1.9× 392 1.1× 148 0.9× 234 1.5× 146 1.0× 87 2.5k
Jeffrey A. Saunders Hong Kong 15 1.3k 1.3× 162 0.4× 91 0.6× 94 0.6× 335 2.3× 48 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Constance S. Royden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constance S. Royden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance S. Royden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance S. Royden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constance S. Royden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance S. Royden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance S. Royden. The network helps show where Constance S. Royden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constance S. Royden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constance S. Royden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constance S. Royden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Constance S. Royden. Constance S. Royden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2016). The effect of monocular depth cues on the detection of moving objects by moving observers. Vision Research. 124. 7–14. 7 indexed citations
2.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2014). Detecting moving objects in an optic flow field using direction- and speed-tuned operators. Vision Research. 98. 14–25. 20 indexed citations
3.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2012). Use of speed cues in the detection of moving objects by moving observers. Vision Research. 59. 17–24. 41 indexed citations
4.
Hildreth, Ellen C. & Constance S. Royden. (2011). Integrating multiple cues to depth order at object boundaries. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 73(7). 2218–2235. 12 indexed citations
5.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2010). The detection of moving objects by moving observers. Vision Research. 50(11). 1014–1024. 35 indexed citations
6.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2010). The effect of object speed and angle on the perceived rigidity of an optic flow field. Journal of Vision. 7(9). 100–100. 1 indexed citations
7.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2007). A model for simultaneous computation of heading and depth in the presence of rotations. Vision Research. 47(24). 3025–3040. 5 indexed citations
8.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2006). Factors affecting curved versus straight path heading perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 68(2). 184–193. 11 indexed citations
9.
Royden, Constance S. & Lucia M. Vaina. (2004). Is precise discrimination of low level motion needed for heading discrimination?. Neuroreport. 15(6). 1013–1017. 9 indexed citations
10.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2003). A model using MT-like motion-opponent operators explains an illusory transformation in the optic flow field. Vision Research. 43(26). 2811–2826. 17 indexed citations
11.
Royden, Constance S.. (2002). Computing heading in the presence of moving objects: a model that uses motion-opponent operators. Vision Research. 42(28). 3043–3058. 57 indexed citations
12.
Royden, Constance S., et al.. (2001). Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics. 63(3). 436–444. 61 indexed citations
13.
Hildreth, Ellen C., et al.. (2000). From vision to action: Experiments and models of steering control during driving.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 26(3). 1106–1132. 18 indexed citations
14.
Royden, Constance S. & Ellen C. Hildreth. (1999). Differential effects of shared attention on perception of heading and 3-D object motion. Perception & Psychophysics. 61(1). 120–133. 25 indexed citations
15.
Royden, Constance S.. (1997). Mathematical analysis of motion-opponent mechanisms used in the determination of heading and depth. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14(9). 2128–2128. 70 indexed citations
16.
Royden, Constance S. & Ellen C. Hildreth. (1996). Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics. 58(6). 836–856. 94 indexed citations
17.
Royden, Constance S.. (1994). Analysis of misperceived observer motion during simulated eye rotations. Vision Research. 34(23). 3215–3222. 72 indexed citations
18.
Royden, Constance S., James A. Crowell, & Martin S. Banks. (1994). Estimating heading during eye movements. Vision Research. 34(23). 3197–3214. 187 indexed citations
19.
Royden, Constance S., Martin S. Banks, & James A. Crowell. (1992). The perception of heading during eye movements. Nature. 360(6404). 583–585. 275 indexed citations
20.
Watson, John, Martin S. Banks, Claes von Hofsten, & Constance S. Royden. (1992). Gravity as a Monocular Cue for Perception of Absolute Distance and/or Absolute Size. Perception. 21(1). 69–76. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026