Conrad Savy

799 total citations
10 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

Conrad Savy is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Conrad Savy has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Conrad Savy's work include Environmental Conservation and Management (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Conrad Savy is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Conservation and Management (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). Conrad Savy collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Conrad Savy's co-authors include John D. Pilgrim, Amrei von Hase, Toby Gardner, Susie Brownlie, Kerry ten Kate, Jo Treweek, Graham Ussher, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, R. T. Theo Stephens and Helen Temple and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Nature Ecology & Evolution and Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Conrad Savy

10 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Conrad Savy United Kingdom	6	312	259	200	113	71	10	446
Israel Klug Brazil	4	119 0.4×	83 0.3×	227 1.1×	40 0.4×	69 1.0×	4	387
Alison Campbell United Kingdom	8	76 0.2×	149 0.6×	375 1.9×	99 0.9×	162 2.3×	11	535
Samuel P. Sinclair United Kingdom	6	165 0.5×	106 0.4×	176 0.9×	73 0.6×	129 1.8×	6	344
Mark Botha South Africa	7	137 0.4×	134 0.5×	245 1.2×	137 1.2×	134 1.9×	14	404
Flavio L. M. Freitas Brazil	9	67 0.2×	74 0.3×	202 1.0×	33 0.3×	42 0.6×	13	368
Worship Mugido South Africa	7	100 0.3×	78 0.3×	242 1.2×	79 0.7×	66 0.9×	10	349
Jimmy Kagan United States	4	96 0.3×	229 0.9×	395 2.0×	84 0.7×	113 1.6×	7	526
Roopa Krithivasan United States	8	62 0.2×	104 0.4×	305 1.5×	66 0.6×	165 2.3×	9	472
Grant Hauer Canada	11	48 0.2×	137 0.5×	222 1.1×	75 0.7×	127 1.8×	27	427
Ross W. Gorte United States	9	27 0.1×	73 0.3×	216 1.1×	85 0.8×	77 1.1×	49	358

Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Savy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Savy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Savy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Savy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Savy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Savy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Savy. The network helps show where Conrad Savy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Conrad Savy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Conrad Savy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Conrad Savy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Conrad Savy. Conrad Savy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Maron, Martine, Jeremy S. Simmonds, James Watson, et al.. (2019). Global no net loss of natural ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4(1). 46–49. 42 indexed citations

2.

Savy, Conrad, et al.. (2018). Environmental, health, and safety approaches for hydropower projects. 1–74. 2 indexed citations

3.

Bennun, Leon, Eugenie Regan, Jeremy P. Bird, et al.. (2017). The Value of the IUCN Red List for Business Decision‐Making. Conservation Letters. 11(1). 51 indexed citations

4.

Bennun, Leon, et al.. (2015). No net loss and net positive impact approaches to biodiversity : report overview. IUCN eBooks. 1 indexed citations

5.

Pilgrim, John D., Susie Brownlie, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, et al.. (2013). Offsetability is highest for common and widespread biodiversity: response to Regnery et al .. Conservation Letters. 6(5). 387–388. 9 indexed citations

6.

Gardner, Toby, Amrei von Hase, Susie Brownlie, et al.. (2013). Biodiversity Offsets and the Challenge of Achieving No Net Loss. Conservation Biology. 27(6). 1254–1264. 203 indexed citations

7.

Pilgrim, John D., Susie Brownlie, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, et al.. (2012). A process for assessing the offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters. 6(5). 376–384. 91 indexed citations

8.

Bedê, Lúcio Cadaval, Miroslav Honzák, Tim J. Killeen, et al.. (2010). Tools and methodologies to support more sustainable biofuel feedstock production. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 38(2). 371–374. 5 indexed citations

9.

Hennenberg, Klaus, Jennifer Hewson, Bambi Semroc, et al.. (2009). The Power of Bioenergy‐Related Standards to Protect Biodiversity. Conservation Biology. 24(2). 412–423. 41 indexed citations

10.

Savy, Conrad, et al.. (2007). Joint Forest Management In Chome Catchment Forest Reserve, Tanzania: The Role Of Socio-Economic And Institutional Factors In Determining Sustainable Forest Conservation. 76(1). 1–10. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact