Jo Treweek

1.6k total citations
29 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jo Treweek is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Treweek has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 12 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Jo Treweek's work include Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (11 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (9 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers). Jo Treweek is often cited by papers focused on Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (11 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (9 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers). Jo Treweek collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Jo Treweek's co-authors include Stewart Thompson, Susie Brownlie, Kerry ten Kate, Amrei von Hase, Conrad Savy, John D. Pilgrim, Toby Gardner, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, Graham Ussher and R. T. Theo Stephens and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Journal of Environmental Management and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Jo Treweek

28 papers receiving 899 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jo Treweek United Kingdom 15 725 348 341 238 182 29 1.0k
Stewart Thompson United Kingdom 20 421 0.6× 309 0.9× 100 0.3× 391 1.6× 182 1.0× 35 992
Abbie A. Rogers Australia 16 224 0.3× 210 0.6× 298 0.9× 149 0.6× 42 0.2× 29 711
Andréa Aguiar Azevedo Brazil 10 180 0.2× 977 2.8× 338 1.0× 241 1.0× 30 0.2× 18 1.4k
Fleur J. F. Maseyk Australia 13 359 0.5× 415 1.2× 285 0.8× 148 0.6× 9 0.0× 22 755
Amy Pocewicz United States 16 282 0.4× 593 1.7× 249 0.7× 447 1.9× 14 0.1× 22 1.0k
Stewart Maginnis Switzerland 13 215 0.3× 825 2.4× 125 0.4× 239 1.0× 25 0.1× 40 1.2k
Wolfgang Wende Germany 16 282 0.4× 455 1.3× 110 0.3× 82 0.3× 147 0.8× 41 832
Sara Aniyar Sweden 6 307 0.4× 689 2.0× 392 1.1× 192 0.8× 17 0.1× 7 1.2k
Lorne A. Greig Canada 11 395 0.5× 318 0.9× 39 0.1× 220 0.9× 206 1.1× 12 939
Romain Pirard France 17 292 0.4× 1.1k 3.1× 514 1.5× 223 0.9× 28 0.2× 54 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Treweek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Treweek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Treweek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Treweek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Treweek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Treweek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Treweek. The network helps show where Jo Treweek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Treweek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Treweek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Treweek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Treweek. Jo Treweek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bladon, Andrew J., et al.. (2024). England's statutory biodiversity metric enhances plant, but not bird nor butterfly, biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology. 61(8). 1918–1931. 6 indexed citations
2.
Torres, Aurora, Bram Noble, Gary Tabor, et al.. (2023). Pathways for improving the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: lessons from five case studies. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 41(5). 374–390. 2 indexed citations
3.
Maron, Martine, Fabien Quétier, Kerry ten Kate, et al.. (2023). ‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8(1). 14–17. 35 indexed citations
4.
Torres, Aurora, et al.. (2022). Treatment of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: A global survey of current practices and common issues. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 40(6). 460–474. 13 indexed citations
5.
Burton, A. Cole, Jason T. Fisher, Peter Adriaens, et al.. (2018). Density and distribution of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population within the Caucasus biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Mammalogy. 99(5). 1249–1260. 16 indexed citations
6.
Carey, Peter, Geoffrey Griffiths, Ioannis Ν. Vogiatzakis, et al.. (2016). Balancing conservation and climate change – a methodology using existing data demonstrated for twelve UK priority habitats. Journal for Nature Conservation. 30. 76–89. 5 indexed citations
7.
Pilgrim, John D., Susie Brownlie, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, et al.. (2013). Offsetability is highest for common and widespread biodiversity: response to Regnery et al .. Conservation Letters. 6(5). 387–388. 9 indexed citations
8.
Henninger, Norbert, et al.. (2013). Weaving Ecosystem Services into Impact Assessment. 19 indexed citations
9.
Gardner, Toby, Amrei von Hase, Susie Brownlie, et al.. (2013). Biodiversity Offsets and the Challenge of Achieving No Net Loss. Conservation Biology. 27(6). 1254–1264. 203 indexed citations
10.
Pilgrim, John D., Susie Brownlie, Jonathan M. M. Ekstrom, et al.. (2012). A process for assessing the offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters. 6(5). 376–384. 91 indexed citations
11.
Treweek, Jo, Claire Brown, & Philip Bubb. (2006). Assessing biodiversity impacts of trade: a review of challenges in the agriculture sector. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 24(4). 299–309. 10 indexed citations
12.
Treweek, Jo, et al.. (1999). GIS for ecology : an introduction. 13 indexed citations
13.
Treweek, Jo. (1999). Book Reviews: "Bioregional Assessments — Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy", K. Norman Johnson, Frederick Swanson, Margaret Herring & Sarah Greene (Eds). Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 1(4). 538–539. 14 indexed citations
14.
Treweek, Jo, J. O. Mountford, S. J. Manchester, et al.. (1998). Wetland restoration research in Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
15.
Thompson, Stewart, et al.. (1997). The Ecological Component of Environmental Impact Assessment: A Critical Review of British Environmental Statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 40(2). 157–172. 83 indexed citations
16.
Treweek, Jo, et al.. (1995). Environmental Impact Assessment: Cutting Edge for the Twenty-First Century.. Journal of Applied Ecology. 32(4). 885–885. 72 indexed citations
17.
Treweek, Jo, et al.. (1995). The Land Cover Map of Great Britain: a new data source for environmental planning and management. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 3 indexed citations
18.
Firbank, L. G., Henry R. Arnold, B. C. Eversham, et al.. (1993). Managing set-aside land for wildlife. NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council). 21 indexed citations
19.
Treweek, Jo, et al.. (1993). Ecological assessment of proposed road developments: a review of environmental statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 36(3). 295–307. 58 indexed citations
20.
Treweek, Jo. (1993). The earth in transition. Patterns and processes of biotic impoverishment. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 43(3-4). 357–358. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026