Conrad Boton

1.1k total citations
45 papers, 664 citations indexed

About

Conrad Boton is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Management Science and Operations Research and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Conrad Boton has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 664 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Building and Construction, 17 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 10 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Recurrent topics in Conrad Boton's work include BIM and Construction Integration (39 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (17 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (7 papers). Conrad Boton is often cited by papers focused on BIM and Construction Integration (39 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (17 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (7 papers). Conrad Boton collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Luxembourg and Australia. Conrad Boton's co-authors include Daniel Forgues, S Kubicki, Gilles Halin, Louis Rivest, Pierre Blanchet, Heap‐Yih Chong, Julie Jupp, Sylvie Nadeau, Ivanka Iordanova and J.H.M. Tah and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sustainability and Automation in Construction.

In The Last Decade

Conrad Boton

42 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Conrad Boton Canada 12 546 244 196 143 99 45 664
Atul Khanzode United States 9 429 0.8× 283 1.2× 108 0.6× 73 0.5× 60 0.6× 13 481
Christoph Merschbrock Norway 14 617 1.1× 422 1.7× 128 0.7× 115 0.8× 90 0.9× 31 743
Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera Chile 15 298 0.5× 98 0.4× 165 0.8× 145 1.0× 103 1.0× 45 625
Pietro Capone Italy 10 366 0.7× 111 0.5× 205 1.0× 121 0.8× 50 0.5× 23 579
Muhammad Tariq Shafiq United Arab Emirates 11 344 0.6× 168 0.7× 107 0.5× 55 0.4× 150 1.5× 25 614
James Goedert United States 8 330 0.6× 190 0.8× 115 0.6× 80 0.6× 33 0.3× 21 460
Sergio Rodríguez United Kingdom 8 448 0.8× 107 0.4× 130 0.7× 119 0.8× 46 0.5× 24 597
Kihong Ku United States 8 501 0.9× 324 1.3× 101 0.5× 89 0.6× 26 0.3× 13 610
Sungjin Kim South Korea 13 333 0.6× 121 0.5× 136 0.7× 102 0.7× 77 0.8× 53 698

Countries citing papers authored by Conrad Boton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conrad Boton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conrad Boton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conrad Boton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conrad Boton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conrad Boton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conrad Boton. The network helps show where Conrad Boton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Conrad Boton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Conrad Boton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Conrad Boton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Conrad Boton. Conrad Boton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rivest, Louis, et al.. (2024). Engineering change management: comparing theory to a case study from aerospace. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management. 15(4). 318–342.
2.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2024). Comparative Study of Three 4D Simulation Software. Espace ÉTS (ETS). null–null.
3.
Khan, Numan, Sylvie Nadeau, Xuan-Tan Pham, & Conrad Boton. (2024). Exploring associations between accident types and activities in construction using natural language processing. Automation in Construction. 164. 105457–105457. 5 indexed citations
4.
Lapalme, James, et al.. (2023). Practitioners’ Concerns about Their Liability toward BIM Collaborative Digital Mockups: Case Study in Civil Engineering. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 149(9). 5 indexed citations
5.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2023). Construction Simulation and Environmental Impact Analysis: Towards a 4D-Based Analysis of Road Project Variants. Sustainability. 15(20). 14991–14991. 2 indexed citations
6.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2023). COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL REALITY IN CONSTRUCTION COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO REMOTE MULTI-USER SYSTEMS. Espace ÉTS (ETS). 684–693. 2 indexed citations
7.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2023). BIM-Based Checking Method for the Mass Timber Industry. Buildings. 13(6). 1474–1474. 8 indexed citations
8.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2022). Implementing Construction Planning and Control Software: A Specialized Contractor Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 148(9). 5 indexed citations
9.
Bolonio, David, et al.. (2022). Use of KROQI as a Level-2 Common Data Environment in the French Construction Industry. Sustainability. 14(16). 10455–10455. 6 indexed citations
10.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2020). Fire Safety in Tall Timber Building: A BIM-Based Automated Code-Checking Approach. Buildings. 10(7). 121–121. 49 indexed citations
11.
Boton, Conrad, Louis Rivest, Daniel Forgues, & Julie Jupp. (2018). Comparison of shipbuilding and construction industries from the product structure standpoint. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management. 11(3). 191–191. 13 indexed citations
12.
Boton, Conrad & Daniel Forgues. (2018). A systemic approach for BIM-based collaboration study in construction. Espace ÉTS (ETS). 1 indexed citations
13.
Jupp, Julie, Louis Rivest, Daniel Forgues, & Conrad Boton. (2018). Comparison of shipbuilding and construction industries from the product structure standpoint. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management. 11(3). 191–191. 7 indexed citations
14.
Boton, Conrad, Daniel Forgues, & Gilles Halin. (2018). A framework for building information modeling implementation in engineering education. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 45(10). 866–877. 19 indexed citations
16.
Boton, Conrad, Daniel Forgues, & Gilles Halin. (2017). Les enjeux liés à l’intégration de l’approche BIM de modélisation des données du bâtiment à l’enseignement universitaire : cas d’une école d’ingénierie. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(2). 5–5. 3 indexed citations
17.
Boton, Conrad & Daniel Forgues. (2017). The Need for a New Systemic Approach to Study Collaboration in the Construction Industry. Procedia Engineering. 196. 1043–1050. 11 indexed citations
18.
Boton, Conrad, et al.. (2015). Top down vs. bottom up approaches regarding the implementation of Lean Construction through a French case study. 73–82. 12 indexed citations
19.
Kubicki, S & Conrad Boton. (2014). IT Barometer Survey in Luxembourg: First Results to Understand IT Innovation in Construction Sector. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014). 17. 179–186. 9 indexed citations
20.
Boton, Conrad, S Kubicki, & Gilles Halin. (2011). Method to Design Coordinated Multiple Views Adapted to User's Business Requirements in 4D Collaborative Tools in AEC. Espace ÉTS (ETS). 96–101. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026