Cong Jiang

492 citations
26 papers · 385 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cong Jiang

26 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Cong Jiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Water Science and Technology 217
  • Global and Planetary Change 283
  • Environmental Engineering 81
  • Earth-Surface Processes 30
  • Atmospheric Science 72
Replace Taichi TEBAKARI with:
Taichi TEBAKARI Japan
Chongxun Mo China
Jolanda Theeuwen Netherlands
Laurène Bouaziz Netherlands
Enrique Muñoz Chile
El Mahdi El Khalki Morocco
Jungho Kim United States
Yoichi Iwami Japan
M. D. Zaidman United Kingdom
Cong Jiang relative to Taichi TEBAKARI Japan Taichi TEBAKARI's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Taichi TEBAKARI · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cong Jiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Jiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Jiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Jiang. The network helps show where Cong Jiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Jiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cong Jiang Line = papers co-authored together Cong Jiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201958
2 202153
3 202236
4 201932
5 201828
6 201925
7 202117
8 201917
9 202116
10 202016
11 202314
12 202212
13 201911
14 20238
15 20226
16 20235
17 20225
18 20225
19 20225
20 20204

About Cong Jiang

Cong Jiang is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Earth-Surface Processes and Ecology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (17 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (13 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (12 papers), Climate variability and models (5 papers), Karst Systems and Hydrogeology (5 papers), Groundwater and Watershed Analysis (3 papers), Hydrological Forecasting Using AI (3 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (217 citations), Global and Planetary Change (283 citations), Environmental Engineering (81 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (30 citations) and Atmospheric Science (72 citations). Cong Jiang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Norway and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lihua Xiong, Lei Yan, Chong‐Yu Xu, Zhangjun Liu, Mingming Luo, Dong Wang, Quan Zhang, Pengtao Yan, Zheng Ren and Qinghua Luan. Their work appears in journals such as Water, Journal of Hydrology, Water Resources Management, Hydrology and earth system sciences and Hydrological Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact