Coloma Costas
About
In The Last Decade
Coloma Costas
12 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Molecular Biology 165
- Molecular Medicine 154
- Genetics 81
- Epidemiology 70
- Endocrinology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Coloma Costas
This map shows the geographic impact of Coloma Costas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coloma Costas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coloma Costas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Coloma Costas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Coloma Costas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Coloma Costas. The network helps show where Coloma Costas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Coloma Costas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Coloma Costas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Coloma Costas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Coloma Costas. Coloma Costas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 48 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 41 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.