Colleen Dockery
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Jiřı́ HoráčekNiels BirbaumerChristian PlewniaMiloslav KopečekCyril HöschlM WesierskaTomáš PáleníčekPavel Mohr
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers)Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Colleen Dockery
18 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 583
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 383
- Neurology 382
- Psychiatry and Mental health 312
- Molecular Biology 167
Countries citing papers authored by Colleen Dockery
This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen Dockery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen Dockery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen Dockery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Colleen Dockery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen Dockery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen Dockery. The network helps show where Colleen Dockery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colleen Dockery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colleen Dockery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colleen Dockery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colleen Dockery. Colleen Dockery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 298 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | The double-blind sham-controlled study of high-frequency rTMS (20 Hz) for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: negative results. | 55 |
| 8 | 372 | |
| 9 | Regional brain metabolism as the predictor of performance on the Trail Making Test in schizophrenia. A 18FDG PET covariation study. | 19 |
| 10 | Moclobemide and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of social phobia. A six-month controlled study and 24 months follow up. | 20 |
| 11 | 123 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 75 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Hyperprolactinemia after low dose of amisulpride. | 34 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 15 |
About Colleen Dockery
Colleen Dockery is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (382 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (583 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (58 citations). Colleen Dockery has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Poland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jiřı́ Horáček, Niels Birbaumer, Christian Plewnia, Miloslav Kopeček, Cyril Höschl, M Wesierska, Tomáš Páleníček, Pavel Mohr, Vĕra Bubeníková‐Valešová and André A. Fenton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior and Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.