Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
20001.8k citationsColleen Cook, Fred Heath et al.Educational and Psychological Measurementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Colleen Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colleen Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colleen Cook more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colleen Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colleen Cook. The network helps show where Colleen Cook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colleen Cook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colleen Cook.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colleen Cook based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Colleen Cook. Colleen Cook is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cook, Colleen, et al.. (2006). LibQUAL+® 2010 Survey: Georgia Institute of Technology. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Cook, Colleen, et al.. (2003). LibQUAL+™ Spring 2003 Survey: Institution Results Georgia Tech Library. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
10.
Heath, Fred, Bruce Thompson, Colleen Cook, Russel L. Thompson, & Martha Kyrillidou. (2002). LibQUAL+[TM]: A Methodological Suite; Reliability and Structure of LibQUAL+[TM] Scores: Measuring Perceived Library Service Quality; Score Norms for Improving Library Service Quality: A LibQUAL+[TM] Study; ARL Index and Other Validity Correlates of LibQUAL+[TM] Scores.. portal Libraries and the Academy. 2(1). 1–42.1 indexed citations
Cook, Colleen & Bruce Thompson. (2001). Psychometric Properties of Scores from the Web-Based LibQUAL+ Study of Perceptions of Library Service Quality. Library trends. 49(4). 585–604.70 indexed citations
13.
Cook, Colleen & Fred Heath. (2001). Users' Perceptions of Library Service Quality: A LibQUAL+ Qualitative Study.. Library trends. 49(4). 548–584.114 indexed citations
14.
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, & Bruce Thompson. (2001). Libqual+. Journal of Library Administration. 35(4). 41–46.25 indexed citations
Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, & Russel L. Thompson. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60(6). 821–836.1765 indexed citations breakdown →
Cook, Colleen. (2000). A Review of Intraclass Correlation..4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.