Colin Smith

3.2k citations
10 papers · 2.2k · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Colin Smith

5 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Colin Smith's Hit Papers

Phenomenology of Perception. 1964 · 2.2k citations
2.2k0+20+41Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k

Peers

Colin Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Philosophy 419
  • General Psychology 40
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 381
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 123
  • Human-Computer Interaction 114
Replace Anthony Manser with:
Anthony Manser United Kingdom
Aron Gurwitsch United Kingdom
James P. Mackey United States
Elaine Scarry United States
Lisa Blackman United Kingdom
Herbert S. Gross United States
Peter Goldie United Kingdom
Carl Gustav Jung United States
David Sudnow
John Cromby United Kingdom
Colin Smith relative to Anthony Manser United Kingdom Anthony Manser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Anthony Manser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Smith. The network helps show where Colin Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Colin Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Smith Line = papers co-authored together Colin Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Phenomenology of Perception.
Hit paper breakdown →
19642201
2 196911
3 19644
4 20144
5 19701
6 19871
7 19601
8
Missional Conversations: A Dialogue between Theory and Praxis in World Mission
20181
9 19570
10 19660

About Colin Smith

Colin Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), French Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (419 citations), General Psychology (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (381 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (123 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (114 citations). Colin Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mary Warnock, Albert Rabil and Alan Montefiore. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, The Modern Language Review and Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact