Colin Roberts
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Archeology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Communication
- Co-authors
- Martin InnesT. C. SkeatG. D. KilpatrickAlun PreeceLaurence F. AbbottHelen InnesMatthew WilliamsDavid Gadd
- Topics
- Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers)
- Journals
- Law & Society ReviewThe British Journal of CriminologyIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingaporeSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Colin Roberts
25 papers receiving 162 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Religious studies 40
- Archeology 30
- Political Science and International Relations 30
- Communication 28
Countries citing papers authored by Colin Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Roberts. The network helps show where Colin Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colin Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colin Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colin Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colin Roberts. Colin Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | Understanding who commits hate crimes and why they do it | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | Manuscript, Society and Belief in early Christian Egypt | 32 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Colin Roberts
Colin Roberts is a scholar working on Religious studies, Medical Laboratory Technology and Communication, having authored 28 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (40 citations), Communication (28 citations) and Classics (14 citations). Colin Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Martin Innes, T. C. Skeat, G. D. Kilpatrick, Alun Preece, Laurence F. Abbott, Helen Innes, Matthew Williams, David Gadd, Nathan E. Cook and Irena Spasić. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, The British Journal of Criminology and IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.