Cody E. Hinchliff

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 721 citations indexed

About

Cody E. Hinchliff is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cody E. Hinchliff has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 721 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Cody E. Hinchliff's work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers). Cody E. Hinchliff is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers). Cody E. Hinchliff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Cody E. Hinchliff's co-authors include Joseph W. Brown, Stephen A. Smith, Eric H. Roalson, Joseph F. Walker, James B. Pease, Luke J. Harmon, Matthew W. Pennell, Pamela S. Soltis, Jonathan M. Eastman and David C. Tank and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioinformatics, PLoS ONE and New Phytologist.

In The Last Decade

Cody E. Hinchliff

13 papers receiving 713 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Quartet Sampling distinguishes lack of support from conflicting support in the green plant tree of life

2018 199 citations James B. Pease, Joseph W. Brown et al. American Journal of Botany profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Cody E. Hinchliff United States	10	404	385	348	195	75	14	721
Christopher P. Randle United States	16	556 1.4×	475 1.2×	352 1.0×	206 1.1×	66 0.9×	35	852
Natalie Cusimano Germany	12	375 0.9×	361 0.9×	290 0.8×	133 0.7×	95 1.3×	14	694
Andrea Weeks United States	18	657 1.6×	350 0.9×	339 1.0×	120 0.6×	154 2.1×	42	943
Jenny K. Archibald United States	15	516 1.3×	279 0.7×	282 0.8×	243 1.2×	182 2.4×	27	731
Chodon Sass United States	11	461 1.1×	495 1.3×	240 0.7×	198 1.0×	52 0.7×	17	842
Margaret M. Heslewood Australia	14	771 1.9×	492 1.3×	443 1.3×	165 0.8×	103 1.4×	35	1.0k
Mark G. Harrington Australia	12	492 1.2×	377 1.0×	230 0.7×	100 0.5×	125 1.7×	15	766
Edgardo M. Ortiz Germany	10	317 0.8×	313 0.8×	146 0.4×	223 1.1×	56 0.7×	19	604
Simon Uribe‐Convers United States	12	337 0.8×	286 0.7×	201 0.6×	143 0.7×	52 0.7×	16	512
Sandra Luz Gómez‐Acevedo Mexico	6	702 1.7×	427 1.1×	330 0.9×	167 0.9×	208 2.8×	14	964

Countries citing papers authored by Cody E. Hinchliff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cody E. Hinchliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cody E. Hinchliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cody E. Hinchliff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cody E. Hinchliff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cody E. Hinchliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cody E. Hinchliff. The network helps show where Cody E. Hinchliff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cody E. Hinchliff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cody E. Hinchliff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cody E. Hinchliff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cody E. Hinchliff. Cody E. Hinchliff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Pease, James B., Joseph W. Brown, Joseph F. Walker, Cody E. Hinchliff, & Stephen A. Smith. (2018). Quartet Sampling distinguishes lack of support from conflicting support in the green plant tree of life. American Journal of Botany. 105(3). 385–403. 199 indexed citations breakdown →

McTavish, Emily Jane, Cody E. Hinchliff, Joseph W. Brown, et al.. (2015). Phylesystem: a git-based data store for community-curated phylogenetic estimates. Bioinformatics. 31(17). 2794–2800. 26 indexed citations

Tank, David C., Jonathan M. Eastman, Matthew W. Pennell, et al.. (2015). Nested radiations and the pulse of angiosperm diversification: increased diversification rates often follow whole genome duplications. New Phytologist. 207(2). 454–467. 274 indexed citations

Pease, James B., et al.. (2015). Data from: Maidenhair ferns, Adiantum, are indeed monophyletic and sister to shoestring ferns, vittarioids (Pteridaceae). Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations

Hinchliff, Cody E., et al.. (2014). Lomatium tarantuloides (Apiaceae), a new narrowly endemic species from northeast Oregon. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 1 indexed citations

Hinchliff, Cody E. & Stephen A. Smith. (2014). Some Limitations of Public Sequence Data for Phylogenetic Inference (in Plants). PLoS ONE. 9(7). e98986–e98986. 37 indexed citations

George, Emma E., et al.. (2014). Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Multiple Cases of Morphological Parallelism and Taxonomic Polyphyly in <I>Lomatium</I> (Apiaceae). Systematic Botany. 39(2). 662–675. 16 indexed citations

Smith, Stephen A., Joseph W. Brown, & Cody E. Hinchliff. (2013). Analyzing and Synthesizing Phylogenies Using Tree Alignment Graphs. PLoS Computational Biology. 9(9). e1003223–e1003223. 24 indexed citations

Hinchliff, Cody E., Steven L. Petersen, & Eric H. Roalson. (2013). Eleocharis endounifascis: A new species of Eleocharis subgenus Limnochloa (Cyperaceae) from northern South America. Phytotaxa. 7(1). 19–24. 2 indexed citations

10.

Hinchliff, Cody E. & Eric H. Roalson. (2012). Using Supermatrices for Phylogenetic Inquiry: An Example Using the Sedges. Systematic Biology. 62(2). 205–219. 69 indexed citations

11.

Hinchliff, Cody E., et al.. (2010). The origins of Eleocharis (Cyperaceae) and the status of Websteria, Egleria, and Chillania. Taxon. 59(3). 709–719. 18 indexed citations

12.

Roalson, Eric H., et al.. (2010). Phylogenetic Relationships in Eleocharis (Cyperaceae): C₄ Photosynthesis Origins and Patterns of Diversification in the Spikerushes. Systematic Botany. 35(2). 257–271. 40 indexed citations

13.

Hinchliff, Cody E. & Eric H. Roalson. (2009). Stem architecture in Eleocharis subgenus Limnochloa (Cyperaceae): Evidence of dynamic morphological evolution in a group of pantropical sedges. American Journal of Botany. 96(8). 1487–1499. 13 indexed citations

14.

Roalson, Eric H., et al.. (1992). HIGIENE dan penyakit ternak. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact