Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis
1994468 citationsCoby van der LindeResources Policyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Coby van der Linde
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Coby van der Linde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coby van der Linde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coby van der Linde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Coby van der Linde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Coby van der Linde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Coby van der Linde. The network helps show where Coby van der Linde may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Coby van der Linde
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Coby van der Linde.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Coby van der Linde based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Coby van der Linde. Coby van der Linde is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Linde, Coby van der. (2018). Changing crude oil trade flows and oil diplomacy. 2018(2).
Fattouh, Bassam & Coby van der Linde. (2011). Twenty years of producer–consumer dialogue. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 84.1 indexed citations
4.
Linde, Coby van der, et al.. (2010). Energy Company strategies in the dynamic EU Energy Market (1995-2007).3 indexed citations
5.
Fritsche, Uwe R., et al.. (2010). BUBE. Better Use of Biomass for Energy. Background Report to the Position Paper of IEA RETD and IEA Bioenergy. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).6 indexed citations
6.
Linde, Coby van der, et al.. (2008). Oil turbulence in the next decade. An essay on high oil prices in a supply-constrained world.8 indexed citations
7.
Linde, Coby van der. (2008). Turning a Weakness into a Strength. A Smart External Energy Policy for Europe.3 indexed citations
8.
Linde, Coby van der. (2007). The art of managing energy security risks. Econstor (Econstor). 12(1). 50–78.2 indexed citations
9.
Linde, Coby van der, et al.. (2006). Escenarios del mañana: sistema geopolítico y petróleo. Política exterior. 20(112). 49–66.1 indexed citations
Linde, Coby van der. (1994). Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. Resources Policy. 20(1). 77–78.468 indexed citations breakdown →
Linde, Coby van der. (1991). Dynamic International Oil Markets: Oil Market Developments and Structure 1860-1990. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
Archer, Léonie J., et al.. (1990). The first oil war : implications of the Gulf crisis in the oil market. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.