Clyde Brown

38 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Clyde Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Gender Studies 99
  • Communication 48
  • Political Science and International Relations 120
  • Oncology 107
  • Public Administration 12
Replace Sonia Alonso Sáenz De Oger with:
Sonia Alonso Sáenz De Oger Spain
Kavita Pandit United States
Michael Atkinson Canada
Wendy J. Schiller United States
Gary King United States
H. Michael Stevenson Canada
Nicholas Bosanquet United Kingdom
John Greenaway United Kingdom
Zhiwen Xiao China
Harvey J. Tucker United States
Clyde Brown relative to Sonia Alonso Sáenz De Oger Spain Sonia Alonso Sáenz De Oger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Sonia Alonso Sáenz De Oger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clyde Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clyde Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clyde Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clyde Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clyde Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clyde Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clyde Brown. The network helps show where Clyde Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clyde Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clyde Brown Line = papers co-authored together Clyde Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201565
2 201946
3 199342
4 202334
5 199929
6
Disparities in the receipt of cardiac revascularization procedures between blacks and whites: an analysis of secular trends.
200829
7 202026
8 199226
9 200126
10 200225
11 199222
12 201917
13 201916
14 200614
15 199514
16 200514
17 198013
18 19948
19 19806
20 20244

About Clyde Brown

Clyde Brown is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (99 citations), Communication (48 citations), Political Science and International Relations (120 citations), Oncology (107 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Clyde Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David M. Paul, Rima Tawk, Paulo S. Pinheiro, Karen E. Callahan, Herbert Waltzer, Erin N. Kobetz, Patricia D. Jones, Askal Ayalew Ali, Levi Ross and Deukwoo Kwon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Journal of Women Politics & Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact