Clive M. Davis

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
22 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Clive M. Davis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Clive M. Davis has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Clive M. Davis's work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). Clive M. Davis is often cited by papers focused on Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). Clive M. Davis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Uganda. Clive M. Davis's co-authors include Robert Bauserman, George E. Schreer, Gregory F. Sanders, William L. Yarber, Sandra L. Davis, Sandra L. Caron, William A. Halteman, Kenneth H. Beck, Hung‐Yu Lin and Marshall H. Segall and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Marriage and the Family and The Journal of Sex Research.

In The Last Decade

Clive M. Davis

21 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Clive M. Davis United States 11 394 393 352 300 299 22 1.1k
Cheryl Shapiro United States 6 346 0.9× 516 1.3× 341 1.0× 207 0.7× 237 0.8× 7 950
Gregory F. Sanders United States 15 441 1.1× 415 1.1× 342 1.0× 210 0.7× 355 1.2× 36 1.3k
Patricia J. Morokoff United States 23 902 2.3× 811 2.1× 314 0.9× 526 1.8× 506 1.7× 40 1.9k
Kathleen M. Ingram United States 16 214 0.5× 591 1.5× 516 1.5× 164 0.5× 367 1.2× 24 1.3k
Andrew S. Walters United States 17 160 0.4× 269 0.7× 298 0.8× 217 0.7× 238 0.8× 39 822
Rachel Cook United Kingdom 22 151 0.4× 202 0.5× 187 0.5× 260 0.9× 223 0.7× 52 1.8k
Meghan M. Gillen United States 21 349 0.9× 880 2.2× 251 0.7× 297 1.0× 309 1.0× 49 1.5k
J. Kenneth Davidson United States 18 519 1.3× 514 1.3× 335 1.0× 269 0.9× 319 1.1× 40 1.1k
Phyllis Kernoff Mansfield United States 22 249 0.6× 206 0.5× 152 0.4× 208 0.7× 196 0.7× 56 1.2k
Kathryn Quina United States 14 444 1.1× 352 0.9× 160 0.5× 270 0.9× 326 1.1× 25 962

Countries citing papers authored by Clive M. Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clive M. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive M. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive M. Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clive M. Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive M. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive M. Davis. The network helps show where Clive M. Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clive M. Davis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clive M. Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clive M. Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clive M. Davis. Clive M. Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1999). Predicting Perceptions of Date Rape Based on Individual Beliefs and Female Alcohol Consumption.. Journal of college student development. 40(6). 701–709. 10 indexed citations
2.
Sanders, Gregory F., Clive M. Davis, William L. Yarber, et al.. (1999). Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 61(4). 1087–1087. 722 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1999). Belief in Token Resistance and Type of Resistance as Predictors of Men's Perceptions of Date Rape. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy. 24(3). 189–196. 10 indexed citations
4.
Caron, Sandra L., D. Bruce Carter, Clive M. Davis, & Eleanor D. Macklin. (1997). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Workshop Interventions on Contraceptive Use Among First-Year College Students. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. 9(3-4). 99–120. 2 indexed citations
5.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1997). Predicting Men's Perceptions of Date Rape Using the Heuristic-Systematic Model. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy. 22(3). 25–32. 12 indexed citations
6.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1996). Characteristics of vibrator use among women. The Journal of Sex Research. 33(4). 313–320. 35 indexed citations
7.
Bauserman, Robert & Clive M. Davis. (1996). Perceptions of Early Sexual Experiences and Adult Sexual Adjustment. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. 8(3). 37–59. 7 indexed citations
8.
Davis, Clive M. & Robert Bauserman. (1993). Exposure to Sexually Explicit Materials: An Attitude Change Perspective. 4(1). 121–209. 32 indexed citations
9.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1993). Book reviews. The Journal of Sex Research. 30(4). 336–343. 1 indexed citations
10.
Caron, Sandra L., et al.. (1993). Predictors of condom‐related behaviors among first‐year college students. The Journal of Sex Research. 30(3). 252–259. 108 indexed citations
11.
Caron, Sandra L., et al.. (1992). “America Responds to AIDS,” But Did College Students? Differences Between March, 1987, and September, 1988. AIDS Education and Prevention. 4(1). 18–28. 18 indexed citations
12.
Davis, Clive M.. (1988). Editor's report. The Journal of Sex Research. 24(1). 390–396.
13.
Beck, Kenneth H. & Clive M. Davis. (1980). PREDICTING SMOKING INTENTIONS AND BEHAVIORS FROM ATTITUDES, NORMATIVE BELIEFS, AND EMOTIONAL AROUSAL. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal. 8(2). 185–192. 6 indexed citations
14.
Beck, Kenneth H. & Clive M. Davis. (1978). Effects of Fear-Arousing Communications and Topic Importance on Attitude Change. The Journal of Social Psychology. 104(1). 81–95. 17 indexed citations
15.
Davis, Clive M.. (1977). Policies and procedures of the journal of sex research: An editorial. The Journal of Sex Research. 13(4). 233–237. 1 indexed citations
16.
Davis, Clive M. & Marshall H. Segall. (1971). Effect of Relative Positions of Segments on Strength of the Mueller-Lyer Illusion. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 33(3_suppl). 1051–1058. 3 indexed citations
17.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1971). Cultural values and the risky shift: A cross-cultural test in Uganda and the United States.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 20(3). 392–399. 21 indexed citations
18.
Davis, Clive M.. (1970). Education and Susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer Illusion Among the Banyankole. The Journal of Social Psychology. 82(1). 25–34. 29 indexed citations
19.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1970). A cross-cultural study of the strength of the Muller-Lyer illusion as a function of attentional factors.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 16(3). 403–410. 32 indexed citations
20.
Davis, Clive M., et al.. (1968). A CROSS‐CULTURAL STUDY OF THE STRENGTH OF THE MÜLLER‐LYER ILLUSION AS A FUNCTION OF ATTENTIONAL FACTORS1. ETS Research Bulletin Series. 1968(2). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026